首页> 外文期刊>Food Security >Increasing productivity and improving livelihoods in aquatic agricultural systems: a review of interventions
【24h】

Increasing productivity and improving livelihoods in aquatic agricultural systems: a review of interventions

机译:提高生产力和改善水生农业系统生计:审查干预措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The doubling of global food demand by 2050 is driving resurgence in interventions for agricultural intensification. Globally, 700 million people are dependent on floodplain or coastal systems. Increased productivity in these aquatic agricultural systems is important for meeting current and future food demand. Agricultural intensification in aquatic agricultural systems has contributed to increased agricultural production, yet these increases have not necessarily resulted in broader development outcomes for those most in need. Here we review studies of interventions that have sought to improve productivity in aquatic agricultural systems in Bangladesh, Cambodia and Zambia. We review evidence of development outcomes from these interventions and the particular role of participatory approaches in intervention design and deployment. There was evidence of increases in productivity in 20 of the 31 studies reviewed. Yet, productivity was only measured beyond the life of the intervention in one case, income and food security improvements were rarely quantified, and the social distribution of benefits rarely described. Participatory approaches were employed in 15 studies, and there was some evidence that development outcomes were more substantial than in cases that were less participatory. To explore the impact of participatory approaches further, we examined five empirical cases. Review and empirical cases provide preliminary evidence suggesting participatory approaches contribute to ensuring agriculture and aquaculture interventions into aquatic agricultural systems may better fit local contexts, are sustained longer, and are more able to deliver development benefits to those most in need. A worthy focus of future research would be comparison between outcomes achieved from interventions with differing levels of participation, and the social differentiation of outcomes.
机译:2050年全球粮食需求的加倍推动了农业强化干预的复苏。在全球范围内,7亿人依赖洪泛区或沿海系统。这些水生系统的生产率提高了满足当前和未来的粮食需求很重要。水产农业系统中的农业强化促成了农业生产的增加,但这些增加并不一定导致最需要更广泛的发展成果。在这里,我们审查了对孟加拉国,柬埔寨和赞比亚水生农业系统生产力的干预措施的研究。从这些干预措施以及参与方式在干预设计和部署方面的特殊作用,审查发展结果的证据。有证据表明,31项研究中有20项的生产率增加。然而,在一个案例中仅超出了干预措施的生产率,因此很少量化收入和粮食安全改进,很少描述福利的社会分配。参与式方法在15项研究中使用,并且有一些证据表明,发展结果比对参与性的案例更具重要性。为了进一步探讨参与式方法的影响,我们检查了五个实证情况。审查和经验案件提供了初步证据,提出了参与式方法,以确保农业和水产养殖干预措施变得水生农业系统可以更好地拟合当地背景,持续更长时间,并且更能够为最需要的人提供发展利益。一个有价值的研究焦点将在与参与程度不同的干预措施和结果的社会分化之间取得的成果之间的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号