首页> 外文期刊>Forensic science, medicine, and pathology >Chest compression-associated injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions versus automated chest compression devices (LUCAS II) - a forensic autopsy-based comparison
【24h】

Chest compression-associated injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions versus automated chest compression devices (LUCAS II) - a forensic autopsy-based comparison

机译:心脏抑制患者的胸部压缩损伤手动胸部压缩与自动胸部压缩装置(LUCAS II) - 基于法医尸检的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this autopsy study was to investigate chest-compression associated injuries to the trunk in out-of-hospital and in-hospital non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients treated with automated external chest compression devices (ACCD; all with LUCAS II devices) versus exclusive manual chest compressions (mCC). In this retrospective single-center study, all forensic autopsies between 2011 and 2017 were included. Injuries following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients treated with mCC or ACCD were investigated and statistically compared using a bivariate logistic regression. In the seven-year period with 4433 autopsies, 614 were analyzed following CPR (mCC vs. ACCD: n = 501 vs. n = 113). The presence of any type of trunk injury was correlated with longer resuscitation intervals (30 +/- 15 vs. 44 +/- 25 min, p 0.05). In comparison with mCC, treatment with ACCD led to more frequent skin emphysema (5 vs 0%, p = 0.012), pneumothorax (6 vs. 1%, p = 0.008), lung lesions (19 vs. 4%, p = 0.008), hemopericardium (3 vs 1%, p = 0.025) and liver lesions (10 vs. 1%, p = 0.001), all irrespective of confounding aspects. Higher age and longer CPR durations statistically influenced frequency of sternal and rib fractures (p 0.001). The mean number of fractured ribs did not vary significantly between the groups (6 +/- 3 vs. 7 +/- 2, p = 0.09). In this cohort with unsuccessful CPR, chest compression-related injuries were more frequent following ACCD application than in the mCC group, but with only minutely increased odds ratios. The severity of injuries did not differ between the groups, and no iatrogenic injury was declared by the forensic pathologist as being fatal. In the clinical routine after successful return of spontaneous circulation a computed tomography scan for CPR-associated injuries is recommended as soon as possible.
机译:这种尸检研究的目的是调查用自动外胸部压缩装置(ACCD;所有带Lucas II器件)治疗的医院内外和医院内的非创伤性心脏骤停患者的胸部压缩相关伤害。独家手动胸部按压(MCC)。在这个回顾性单中心研究中,包括2011年和2017年之间的所有法医尸检。使用双重物质回归对用MCC或ACCD治疗的患者进行心肺复苏(CPR)后的受伤,并使用双抗体回归进行统计学。在七年期间,在CPR(MCC与ACCD:n = 501 vs.n = 113)后分析了614次。任何类型的树干损伤的存在与较长的复苏间隔相关(30 +/- 15与44 +/- 25 min,P <0.05)。与MCC相比,随着ACC的处理导致更频繁的皮肤肺气肿(5 Vs 0%,P = 0.012),气胸(6 vs.1%,P = 0.008),肺病灶(19 vs.4%,P = 0.008 ),咯血(3 vs1%,p = 0.025)和肝脏病变(10 vs.1%,p = 0.001),无论对混杂方面都不重要。高龄和较长的CPR持续时间持续影响胸骨和肋骨骨折的频率(P <0.001)。裂缝肋的平均数量在组之间没有显着变化(6 +/- 3对7 +/- 2,P = 0.09)。在这种CPR不成功的群组中,胸部压缩相关的损伤在ACCD应用中比在MCC组中更频繁,但只有几率较高的差距。伤害的严重程度在群体之间没有差异,法医病理学家宣布不归因于致命的。在成功返回自发循环后的临床常规中,尽快推荐用于CPR相关伤害的计算机断层扫描。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号