...
首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:开放性非显微手术,腹腔镜或开放性显微精索静脉曲张切除术治疗男性不育:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Type - Therapy (systematic review) Level of Evidence 1a What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? There are several surgical techniques for the treatment of varicocele in infertile men, including open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy. It is currently unclear, however, which is the most beneficial method for patients. The present meta-analysis found that microsurgical varicocelectomy is the most effective and least morbid method among the three varicocelectomy techniques for treating varicocele in infertile men. OBJECTIVE To compare various techniques of open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or microsurgical varicocelectomy procedures to describe the best method for treating varicocele in infertile men. PATIENTS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) - Science Citation Index and the Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database up to June 2011. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the present study. The outcome measures assessed were pregnancy rate (primary), the incidence of recurrent varicocele, time to return to work, the incidence of postoperative hydrocele and operation duration (secondary). Two authors independently assessed the study quality and extracted data. All data were analysed using Review Manager (version 5.0). RESULTS The present study included four randomized controlled trials comprising 1,015 patients in total. At the follow-up endpoints, patients who had undergone microsurgery showed a significant advantage over those who had undergone open varicocelectomy in terms of pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR]= 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-2.23]. There was no significant difference between laparoscopic and open varicocelectomy (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.65-1.88) or between microsurgery and laparoscopic varicocelectomy (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.84-2.24). The incidences of recurrent varicocele and postoperative hydrocele were significantly lower after microsurgery than after laparoscopic or open varicocelectomy. The time to return to work after microsurgery and laparoscopic varicocelectomy was significantly shorter than that after open varicocelectomy. The operation duration of microsurgical varicocelectomy was longer than that of laparoscopic or open varicocelectomy. CONCLUSIONS Current evidence indicates that microsurgical varicocelectomy is the most effective and least morbid method among the three varicocelectomy techniques for treating varicocele in infertile men. More high-quality, multicentre, long-term RCTs are required to verify the findings.
机译:研究类型-治疗(系统评价)的证据水平1a关于该学科的知识是什么?该研究增加了什么?有几种用于治疗不育男性精索静脉曲张的手术技术,包括开放式非显微手术,腹腔镜和显微外科精索静脉曲张切除术。然而,目前尚不清楚,这是对患者最有益的方法。本荟萃分析发现,显微外科精索静脉曲张切除术是治疗不育男性精索静脉曲张的三种精索静脉曲张切除术中最有效,发病率最低的方法。目的比较开放式非显微手术,腹腔镜或显微手术精索静脉曲张切除术的各种技术,以描述治疗不育男性精索静脉曲张的最佳方法。患者和方法我们检索了截至2011年6月的PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,科学信息研究所(ISI)-科学引文索引和中国生物医学文献数据库。本研究仅包括随机对照试验(RCT)。评估的结局指标为妊娠率(初次),复发性精索静脉曲张发生率,重返工作时间,术后静脉鞘膜积液发生率和手术持续时间(次要)。两位作者独立评估了研究质量并提取了数据。所有数据均使用Review Manager(5.0版)进行了分析。结果本研究包括四项随机对照试验,共1,015例患者。在随访终点,就妊娠率而言,接受显微外科手术的患者比接受开放性精索静脉曲张切除术的患者具有显着优势(优势比[OR] = 1.63,95%置信区间[CI]:1.19-2.23]。腹腔镜和开放性精索静脉曲张切除术(OR = 1.11,95%CI:0.65-1.88)或显微手术和腹腔镜精索静脉曲张切除术(OR = 1.37,95%CI:0.84-2.24)之间无显着差异。显微手术后的鞘膜积液明显低于腹腔镜或开放式精索静脉曲张切除术;显微手术和腹腔镜下的精索静脉曲张切除术恢复工作的时间明显少于开放式精索静脉曲张切除术;显微外科精索静脉曲张切除术的手术时间比腹腔镜或开放式精索静脉曲张切除术的时间更长。当前证据表明,显微外科精索静脉曲张切除术是这三种方法中最有效,病态最少的方法精索静脉曲张切除术治疗不育男性精索静脉曲张。需要更多高质量,多中心的长期RCT来验证发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号