首页> 外文期刊>Early intervention in psychiatry >Should we intervene at stage 0? A qualitative study of attitudes of asymptomatic youth at increased risk of developing bipolar disorders and parents with established disease
【24h】

Should we intervene at stage 0? A qualitative study of attitudes of asymptomatic youth at increased risk of developing bipolar disorders and parents with established disease

机译:我们应该介入0阶段吗? 对患有疾病的双相障碍和父母的风险增加的无症状青年态度的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Studies of potential interventions for asymptomatic individuals at risk of severe mental disorders (ie, clinical stage 0) have focused on genetic counselling or the views of adults with established disease. No study has interviewed youth at risk of bipolar disorders ( BD ). Methods Qualitative analysis of interviews with asymptomatic adolescent offspring of adults with BD ( OSBD ?=?7) and unrelated parents with bipolar disorders ( PBD ?=?6) to examine manifest and latent themes in the dialogue. Results Core themes in both groups were ignorance regarding the magnitude of risk of BD onset in offspring and greater concerns for the health of other family members than for oneself. Parents expressed anxieties in coping with the uncertainty about whether their children would inherit BD and their desire to reduce this risk was partly driven by guilt and their sense of responsibility; PBD favoured the introduction of specialized clinical OSBD services. In contrast, the priority for OSBD was advice on coping with a parent with BD ; OSBD favoured access to generic non‐clinical peer group support, which they perceived as less stigmatizing than specialist services. Conclusion The study highlights that youth at risk of BD should be allowed to express their ideas on what interventions they believe are likely to be most beneficial for them, as their views may differ from other advocates who are routinely consulted, such as PBD . A noteworthy finding was that OSBD thought that being included in the clinical dialogue about their parents’ BD would decrease rather than increase their stress levels.
机译:背景技术对严重精神障碍(即临床第0阶段)风险的潜在干预措施的潜在干预(即临床第0阶段)的重点是遗传咨询或成人患病的观点。没有关于Bipolar障碍(BD)的风险的青年。方法对BD(OSBD?='7)的无症状青少年后代访谈的定性分析(OSBD?=?7)和与双极性障碍的无关父母(PBD?=?6)审查对话中的清单和潜在主题。结果两组中的核心主题是关于后代BD发病风险的程度,对其他家庭成员的健康问题的风险程度无知。父母表示令人焦虑,在应对他们的孩子是否会继承BD的不确定性,以及他们减少这种风险的愿望是部分涉及的内疚和他们的责任感; PBD赞成引入专业的临床OSBD服务。相比之下,OSBD的优先事项是与BD的父母应对的建议; OSBD赞成访问通用非临床对等体组支持,他们认为比专家服务更少侮辱。结论该研究强调了BD风险的青年应允许您对他们认为对他们最有益的干预措施来表达他们的想法,因为他们的观点可能与经常咨询的其他倡导者不同,例如PBD。值得注意的发现是,欧洲织造人士认为被纳入关于父母BD的临床对话将减少而不是增加压力水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号