首页> 外文期刊>Early human development >WASP (write a scientific paper): The ongoing process of ethical decision-making in qualitative research: Ethical principles and their application to the research process
【24h】

WASP (write a scientific paper): The ongoing process of ethical decision-making in qualitative research: Ethical principles and their application to the research process

机译:黄蜂(写一篇科学论文):在定性研究中持续的道德决策过程:道德原则及其在研究过程中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The nature of qualitative research is fundamentally different from quantitative research. In depth understanding and exploration of specific phenomena or their significance usually involve a data collection process with a select few participants with whom the researcher interacts over an extended period of time. The participants are not anonymous to the researcher and they also reveal personal information. Research participants' rights need to be protected, even more so in this type of qualitative work. This chapter discusses how ethical decision-making needs to be ongoing during the research process by applying the principles of respect for persons, beneficence and justice. Respecting research participants, involves addressing issues related to informed consent, anonymity and confidentiality while also reflecting on the researcher's impact on the participant and the research context while the research is carried out and also when the research is disseminated. The second principle of beneficence calls for the researcher to ascertain that participants' safety is given utmost importance. Finally, justice refers to ensuring that the burdens and benefits of research are shared fairly without any form of discrimination or manipulation. These principles offer the researcher flexible tools to reflect on ethical decisions as they arise throughout the research process.
机译:定性研究的性质从本上不同于定量研究。在深入的理解和探索特定现象或其意义通常涉及数据收集过程,与研究人员在延长一段时间内相互作用的少数参与者。参与者并不是研究人员的匿名,他们还揭示了个人信息。研究参与者的权利需要受到保护,在这种类型的定性工作中也有更多如此。本章通过应用尊重人员,福利和正义的原则,讨论在研究过程中如何在研究过程中进行伦理决策。尊重研究参与者涉及解决与知情同意,匿名和机密性有关的问题,同时还反映了研究人员对参与者的影响以及研究的影响,同时在传播研究时也在进行研究。益处的第二原理要求研究人员确定参与者的安全得到最重要的。最后,正义指的是确保研究的负担和福利在没有任何形式的歧视或操纵的情况下公平地共享。这些原则为研究员提供了灵活的工具,以反映在整个研究过程中出现的道德决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号