...
首页> 外文期刊>Ear and hearing. >Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
【24h】

Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.

机译:关于刺激发病和声学变化神经编码的信息掩蔽作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent investigations using cortical auditory evoked potentials have shown masker-dependent effects on sensory cortical processing of speech information. Background noise maskers consisting of other people talking are particularly difficult for speech recognition. Behavioral studies have related this to perceptual masking, or informational masking, beyond just the overlap of the masker and target at the auditory periphery. The aim of the present study was to use cortical auditory evoked potentials, to examine how maskers (i.e., continuous speech-shaped noise [SSN] and multi-talker babble) affect the cortical sensory encoding of speech information at an obligatory level of processing. Specifically, cortical responses to vowel onset and formant change were recorded under different background noise conditions presumed to represent varying amounts of energetic or informational masking. The hypothesis was, that even at this obligatory cortical level of sensory processing, we would observe larger effects on the amplitude and latency of the onset and change components as the amount of informational masking increased across background noise conditions. Onset and change responses were recorded to a vowel change from /u-i/ in young adults under four conditions: quiet, continuous SSN, eight-talker (8T) babble, and two-talker (2T) babble. Repeated measures analyses by noise condition were conducted on amplitude, latency, and response area measurements to determine the differential effects of these noise conditions, designed to represent increasing and varying levels of informational and energetic masking, on cortical neural representation of a vowel onset and acoustic change response waveforms. All noise conditions significantly reduced onset N1 and P2 amplitudes, onset N1-P2 peak to peak amplitudes, as well as both onset and change response area compared with quiet conditions. Further, all amplitude and area measures were significantly reduced for the two babble conditions compared with continuous SSN. However, there were no significant differences in peak amplitude or area for either onset or change responses between the two different babble conditions (eight versus two talkers). Mean latencies for all onset peaks were delayed for noise conditions compared with quiet. However, in contrast to the amplitude and area results, differences in peak latency between SSN and the babble conditions did not reach statistical significance. These results support the idea that while background noise maskers generally reduce amplitude and increase latency of speech-sound evoked cortical responses, the type of masking has a significant influence. Speech babble maskers (eight talkers and two talkers) have a larger effect on the obligatory cortical response to speech sound onset and change compared with purely energetic continuous SSN maskers, which may be attributed to informational masking effects. Neither the neural responses to the onset nor the vowel change, however, were sensitive to the hypothesized increase in the amount of informational masking between speech babble maskers with two talkers compared with eight talkers.
机译:使用皮质听觉诱发电位的最近调查显示了对语音信息的感觉皮质处理的掩蔽依赖性影响。背景噪音掩蔽者由其他人组成的谈话是语音识别的特别困难。行为研究与感知掩蔽或信息屏蔽相关,超出了掩蔽者的重叠和在听觉周边的目标。本研究的目的是使用皮质听觉诱发的电位,以检查屏蔽者的方式(即,连续语音形状噪声[SSN]和多讲话者咔哒声)影响语音信息的强制性处理水平。具体地,在所假定的不同背景噪声条件下记录对元音发作和结晶剂变化的皮质响应,以表示不同量的能量或信息屏蔽。假设是,即使在这种强制性皮质水平的感官加工水平,我们也会观察到发病和改变组件的幅度和等待时间的更大影响,因为当信息掩蔽的量增加了背景噪声条件。在四个条件下的年轻成年人/ U-I / IN的元音变更的发病和变更响应:安静,连续的SSN,八讲车(8T)Babble,以及双讲车(2T)Babble。通过噪声状况分析通过振幅,延迟和响应区域测量来分析,以确定这些噪声条件的差异效果,旨在表示增加和有能力遮蔽的增加和变化水平,对元音发作和声学的皮质神经表示更改响应波形。所有噪声条件显着降低了发病N1和P2振幅,与安静条件相比,开始N1-P2峰值,以及起始和变化响应区域。此外,与连续SSN相比,两个禁止条件显着降低了所有幅度和面积措施。然而,在两个不同的禁止条件(八个与两个讲话者与两个讲车)之间的开始或改变响应的峰值幅度或区域没有显着差异。与安静相比,所有发作峰的平均延迟都会延迟噪声条件。然而,与幅度和区域的结果相反,SSN与禁止条件之间的峰值延迟的差异没有达到统计学意义。这些结果支持的想法,虽然背景噪声掩蔽剂通常降低语音诱发皮质反应的幅度和增加延迟,但掩蔽的类型具有显着的影响。语音欺骗屏蔽者(八个讲话者和两个讲话者)对与纯度精力充沛的连续SSN屏蔽程序相比的语音声音发作和变化的强制性皮质响应效果较大,这可能归因于信息屏蔽效应。然而,对发病和元音变化的神经响应都不敏感,与八个讲话者相比,言语欺骗掩蔽者之间的信息屏蔽数量的令人沮丧的增加敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号