...
首页> 外文期刊>Ear and hearing. >Auditory Evoked Responses in Older Adults With Normal Hearing, Untreated, and Treated Age-Related Hearing Loss
【24h】

Auditory Evoked Responses in Older Adults With Normal Hearing, Untreated, and Treated Age-Related Hearing Loss

机译:具有正常听力,未经处理和治疗的年龄相关的听力损失的老年人的听觉诱发反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: The goal of this study was to identify the effects of auditory deprivation (age-related hearing loss) and auditory stimulation (history of hearing aid use) on the neural registration of sound across two stimulus presentation conditions: (1) equal sound pressure level and (2) equal sensation level. Design: We used a between-groups design, involving three groups of 14 older adults (n = 42; 62 to 84 years): (1) clinically defined normal hearing (<= 25 dB from 250 to 8000 Hz, bilaterally), (2) bilateral mild-moderate/moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss who have never used hearing aids, and (3) bilateral mild-moderate/moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss who have worn bilateral hearing aids for at least the past 2 years. Results: There were significant delays in the auditory P1-N1-P2 complex in older adults with hearing loss compared with their normal hearing peers when using equal sound pressure levels for all participants. However, when the degree and configuration of hearing loss were accounted for through the presentation of equal sensation level stimuli, no latency delays were observed. These results suggest that stimulus audibility modulates P1-N1-P2 morphology and should be controlled for when defining deprivation and stimulus-related neuroplasticity in people with hearing loss. Moreover, a history of auditory stimulation, in the form of hearing aid use, does not appreciably alter the neural registration of unaided auditory evoked brain activity when quantified by the P1-N1-P2. Conclusions: When comparing auditory cortical responses in older adults with and without hearing loss, stimulus audibility, and not hearing loss-related neurophysiological changes, results in delayed response latency for those with age-related hearing loss. Future studies should carefully consider stimulus presentation levels when drawing conclusions about deprivation- and stimulation-related neuroplasticity. Additionally, auditory stimulation, in the form of a history of hearing aid use, does not significantly affect the neural registration of sound when quantified using the P1-N1-P2-evoked response.
机译:目标:本研究的目标是确定听觉剥夺(与年龄相关听力损失)和听觉刺激(助听援助历史)对两个刺激介绍条件的神经注册的影响:(1)相同的声压水平和(2)等等感觉级别。设计:我们使用了一组内部设计,涉及三组14名年龄较大的成年人(n = 42; 62至84岁):(1)临床定义的正常听力(<= 25 dB,从250到8000 Hz,双边),( 2)双侧轻度温和/中等严重严重的感觉损失,谁从未使用过助听器,(3)双边轻度中/中等严重严重的感觉性听力损失至少过去2年。结果:在对所有参与者使用相同的声压水平时,较老年人的较老年人的听觉P1-N1-P2复合物中有显着延迟。然而,当通过呈现相等的感觉水平刺激的呈现来算是听力损失的程度和配置时,没有观察到延迟延迟。这些结果表明,刺激符号调节P1-N1-P2形态,应当控制在与听力损失的人们中定义剥夺和刺激相关的神经塑性时。此外,在助听器使用的形式下,听觉刺激的历史并不明显地改变当通过P1-N1-P2量化时的无辅助听觉诱发脑活动的神经注册。结论:比较旧成年人的听觉皮质反应,刺激损失,刺激可听性,而不是听力相关的神经生理变化,导致具有年龄相关听力损失的人的延迟响应延迟。未来的研究应在绘制剥夺和刺激相关神经塑性的结论时仔细考虑刺激介绍水平。此外,在助听器使用历史的形式外,听觉刺激不会显着影响使用P1-N1-P2诱发的反应量化时声音的神经注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号