...
首页> 外文期刊>GPS Solutions >Assessment of the positioning performance and tropospheric delay retrieval with precise point positioning using products from different analysis centers
【24h】

Assessment of the positioning performance and tropospheric delay retrieval with precise point positioning using products from different analysis centers

机译:使用来自不同分析中心的产品的精确点定位评估定位性能和对流层延迟检索

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The performance of precise point positioning (PPP) strongly depends on the quality of satellite orbit and clock products. To give a full evaluation of PPP performance with the various publicly available precise satellite orbit and clock products, this contribution comprehensively investigates the positioning performance as well as tropospheric delay retrieval of GPS-, GLONASS-, and Galileo-only PPP with the precise products from eight International GNSS Service (IGS) (i.e., cod, emr, esa, gfz, grg, igs, jpl, and mit) and five multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) analysis centers (ACs) (i.e., com, gbm, grm, jax, and wum) based on the observations of 90 MGEX tracking stations in a 1-month period (April 2019). The positioning performance in terms of convergence time and positioning accuracy is assessed by coordinate-static and coordinate-kinematic PPP modes, while the tropospheric delay estimation in terms of accuracy is evaluated by coordinate-fixed PPP mode. For GPS- and GLONASS-only PPP with different AC products, the positioning performances are comparable with each other except that with emr, jpl, mit, and jax products. Overall, the positioning performance with cod and com products provided by CODE ranks the first. For Galileo-only PPP, the grm product performs the best. For ZTD estimation, the accuracy derived from GPS-, GLONASS-, and Galileo-only solutions agrees well and the differences in accuracy among different AC products can be negligible.
机译:精确点定位(PPP)的性能强烈取决于卫星轨道和时钟产品的质量。通过各种公开可用的精确卫星轨道和时钟产品进行全面评估PPP性能,这一贡献全面调查了GPS,GLONASS-和伽利略的对流层延迟检索的定位性能,并使用精确的产品八个国际GNSS服务(IGS)(即COD,EMR,ESA,GFZ,GRG,IGS,JPL和MIT)和五个多GNSS实验(MGEX)分析中心(ACS)(即COM,GBM,GRM, jax和wum)基于在1个月的时间内(2019年4月)的90架麦加跟踪站的观察。通过坐标 - 静态和坐标 - 运动PPP模式评估在收敛时间和定位精度方面的定位性能,而通过坐标固定的PPP模式评估精度的对流层延迟估计。对于仅具有不同AC产品的GPS和GLONASS-PPP,除了使用EMR,JPL,MIT和JAX产品之外,定位性能彼此相对。总的来说,用代码提供的COD和COM产品的定位性能排名第一。对于仅伽利略的PPP,GRM产品表现最佳。对于ZTD估计,GPS - ,Glonass-和Galileo Solutions的准确性均匀良好,不同的AC产品之间的准确性差异可以忽略不计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号