...
首页> 外文期刊>Geophysics: Journal of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists >Determining geophysical responses from burials in graveyards and cemeteries
【24h】

Determining geophysical responses from burials in graveyards and cemeteries

机译:从墓地和墓地中的墓葬中确定地球物理反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Graveyards and cemeteries around the world are increasingly designated as full. Therefore, there is a requirement to identify vacant spaces for new burials or to identify existing ones to exhume and then reinter if necessary. Geophysical methods offer a potentially noninvasive target detection solution; however, there has been limited research to identify optimal geophysical detection methods against burial age. We have collected multifrequency (225-900 MHz) ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity, and magnetic susceptibility surface data over known graves with different burial ages and soil types in three UK church graveyards. Results indicate that progressively older burials are more difficult to detect, but this decrease is not linear and is site specific. Medium-to high-frequency GPR and magnetic susceptibility was optimal in clay-rich soils, medium-to high-frequency GPR and electrical resistivity in sandy soils, and electrical resistivity and low-frequency GPR in coarse sand and pebbly soils, respectively. A multigeophysical technique approach should be used by survey practitioners where grave locations are not known to maximize target detection success. Grave soil and grave cuts are important grave position indicators. Grave headstones were not always located where burials were located. We have determined the value of these techniques in grave detection and could potentially date burials from their geophysical responses.
机译:世界各地的墓地和墓地越来越多地指定为完整。因此,需要识别新墓穴的空间空间或识别现有的空间,或者在必要时识别现有的空间。地球物理方法提供潜在的非侵入性目标检测解决方案;然而,研究了对埋葬年龄的最佳地球物理检测方法进行了有限的研究。我们收集了多频(225-900 MHz)地面穿透雷达(GPR),电阻率和磁性敏感性表面数据,在三个英国教堂墓地中的不同埋藏年龄和土壤类型。结果表明,逐渐较旧的埋葬更难以检测,但这种减少不是线性的,并且是特定的现场。中高频率GPR和磁性敏感性在富含粘土的土壤中最佳,含有含沙污染的中至高频GPR和电阻率,以及粗砂和卵石土壤中的电阻率和低频GPR。调查从业者应该使用多岩神科技术方法,其中不知道严重位置最大化目标检测成功。严重的土壤和严重的切割是重要的严重位置指标。严重墓碑并不总是位于埋葬所在的地方。我们已经确定了这些技术在严重检测中的价值,并且可能会从其地球物理反应中遭受埋葬。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号