首页> 外文期刊>Geriatrics & gerontology international. >Impact of long‐hours family caregiving on non‐fatal coronary heart disease risk in middle‐aged people: Results from a longitudinal nationwide survey in Japan
【24h】

Impact of long‐hours family caregiving on non‐fatal coronary heart disease risk in middle‐aged people: Results from a longitudinal nationwide survey in Japan

机译:长时间家庭对中年人民非致命冠心病风险的影响:日本纵向全国调查的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim The effects of family caregiving, especially long‐hours caregiving, on coronary heart disease (CHD) are debatable. We examined the impact of family caregiving on incident non‐fatal CHD. Methods We used data from the Longitudinal Survey of Middle‐Aged and Elderly Persons from 2005 to 2010, a nationwide panel survey for Japanese people aged 50–59 years in 2005 (baseline). After we excluded non‐respondents and people with missing key variables at baseline, 25 121 individuals without CHD, stroke or cancer were followed up for a mean of 4.6 years. The exposure was assessed at baseline by three indicators: (i) family caregiving; (ii) hours spent caregiving; and (iii) kinship type of care recipient. The non‐fatal CHD incidence was identified according to questionnaire responses from 2006 to 2010. Results Cox's proportional hazards analysis did not show a statistically significant association between family caregiving and incident non‐fatal CHD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–1.40). Caregivers who spent 20–69 h per week on care showed a statistically significant increased risk for non‐fatal CHD (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.23–2.58) compared with non‐caregivers; whereas this increased risk was statistically significant only among women (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27–3.08), but not among men (HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.67–2.71). Kinship type of care recipient did not make a significant difference to the effects of family caregiving on incident non‐fatal CHD. Conclusions Long‐hours family caregiving could be an independent risk factor for incident non‐fatal CHD among middle‐aged women in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 2109–2115.
机译:瞄准家庭护理,特别是漫长时光,冠心病(CHD)的效果是难题的。我们审查了Caregiving对事件非致命核武器的影响。方法采用2005年至2010年从2005年到2010年的中年和老年人纵向调查的数据,是2005年50-59岁(基线)的全国范围的小组调查。在我们被排除在基线的非受访者和缺少关键变量的人之后,25 121名没有CHD,中风或癌症的个体被跟进4.6岁。通过三个指标在基线评估暴露:(i)家庭护理; (ii)花园花费的时间; (iii)亲属类型的护理受援人员。根据2006年至2010年的调查问卷答复鉴定了非致命的CHD发病率。结果COX的比例危害分析在家庭护理和事件非致命核(危险比[HR] 1.13,95%置信区间)之间没有显示出统计上重要的关联[CI] 0.92-1.40)。与非照顾者相比,每周花20-69小时花费每周20-69小时的护理人员对非致命核(HR 1.78,95%CI 1.23-2.58)的统计学显着增加;然而,这种增加的风险只有在女性中统计学意义(HR 1.98,95%CI 1.27-3.08),但不是男性(HR 1.35,95%CI 0.67-2.71)。亲属类型的护理受援人员对家庭护理对事件非致命核的影响没有显着差异。结论日本中年妇女中的事件非致命核武器的独立危险因素是一个独立的危险因素。 Geriadt Gerontol int 2017; 17:2109-2115。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号