...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Rod and frame test and posture under optokinetic stimulation used to explore two complementary aspects of the visual influence in postural control after stroke
【24h】

Rod and frame test and posture under optokinetic stimulation used to explore two complementary aspects of the visual influence in postural control after stroke

机译:杆和框架试验和姿势在Optopetic刺激下,用于探讨中风后姿势控制的视觉影响的两个互补方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Highlights ? Visual sensitivity disturbs postural and balance disorders and limits autonomy. ? Visual sensitivity can be defined according to concepts of perception and action. ? The RFT and the OKS detect 2 relevant effects of visual sensitivity. ? Rehabilitation programs could be personalized according to the visual sensitivity. Abstract Background Balance rehabilitation should consider individual comportments according to visual input (VI). Indeed, visual dependence (VD), defined as the predominance given to the VI whatever the circumstances, frequent after stroke it could disturb balance. Because the term VD is a bit restrictive and cannot be deduced from clinical tests, the term visual sensitivity (VS) is preferred here. Hypothesis VI could have different influence depending on the task for a given individual. Methods We retrospectively compared 2 VS tests routinely used: the rod and frame test (RFT) and optokinetic stimulation (OKS). In RFT, VS was defined by a misperception of the visual verticality induced by a tilted frame (VS RFT) and in OKS by tilted sitting posture induced by rotational OKS (VS OKS). We studied the relations between VS RFT and VS OKS. Results We analysed data for 84 patients, mean age 55±10years, 45±30days after stroke. Scores for both tests were correlated with autonomy measured by the functional independence measure (r=?0.3, p=0.01 and r=?0.2, p=0.02). VS OKS score was also correlated with balance measured by the postural assessment scale for stroke (r=?0.3, p=0.03). VS RFT score was not correlated with VS OKS score (p=0.4, r=0.04). Discussion - conclusion A patient may display VS for one test without sensitivity for the other because these tests investigate different neural organisation — perception for RFT or action for OKS. Their relation to balance disorders should be further investigated to build individualized rehabilitation programs.
机译:强调 ?视觉敏感性扰乱姿势和平衡障碍并限制自主。还可根据感知和动作的概念来定义视觉敏感性。还RFT和OKS检测到视觉敏感性的2个相关效果。还康复计划可以根据视觉敏感性个性化。摘要背景平衡康复应考虑根据视觉输入(VI)的单个转化。实际上,视觉依赖性(VD),定义为vi的优势,无论在中风后频繁频繁,它可能会干扰平衡。因为术语VD是一个有限的限制性并且不能从临床测试推导出来,所以这里优选术语视觉灵敏度(Vs)。假设VI根据给定个人的任务可能产生不同的影响。方法我们回顾性地比较了2个VS测试,常规使用:杆和框架测试(RFT)和Optoprocetic刺激(OKS)。在RFT中,VS由倾斜框架(VS RFT)引起的视觉垂直度令人估计来定义,并且通过旋转OKS诱导的倾斜坐姿(VS OKS)倾斜的坐姿。我们研究了VS RFT与VS OK之间的关系。结果我们分析了84名患者的数据,平均55±10年,中风后45±30天。两个测试的分数与通过功能独立度量测量的自主权相关(R = 0.3,P = 0.01和R = 0.2,P = 0.02)。 VS OKS得分也与由脑卒中姿势评估规模测量的平衡(R =Δ0.3,p = 0.03)相关。 VS RFT分数与VS OKS分数没有相关(P = 0.4,r = 0.04)。讨论 - 结论患者可以在没有敏感性的情况下显示VS,因为这些测试调查了不同的神经组织 - 对OKS的RFT或动作感知。应进一步调查与平衡障碍的关系,以建立个性化的康复计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号