首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Relative prediction intervals reveal larger uncertainty in 3D approaches to predictive digital soil mapping of soil properties with legacy data
【24h】

Relative prediction intervals reveal larger uncertainty in 3D approaches to predictive digital soil mapping of soil properties with legacy data

机译:相对预测间隔揭示了3D方法中的较大不确定性与传统数据的土壤性质预测数字土壤映射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fine scale maps of soil properties enable efficient land management and inform earth system models. Recent efforts to create soil property maps from field observations tend to use similar tree-based machine learning interpolation approaches, but often deal with depth of predictions, validation, and uncertainty differently. One of the main differences in approaches is whether to model individual depths of interest separately as '2D' models, or to create models that incorporate depth as a predictor variable creating a '3D' model that can make predictions for all depths. It is unclear how choice of 2D or 3D approach influences model accuracy and uncertainty due to lack of direct comparison and inconsistent presentation of results in past studies. This study compares 2D and 3D methods for mapping soil electrical conductivity (salinity), pH, sum of fine and very fine sands, and organic carbon at 30 m resolution for the upper 432,000 km(2) of the Colorado River Watershed of the United States of America. A new, simple, model-agnostic relative prediction interval (RPI) approach to report uncertainty is presented that scales prediction interval width to the 95% interquantile width of the original training sample distribution. The RPI approach enables direct comparison of uncertainty between properties and depths and is easily interpretable by end users. Results indicate that 3D mapping of soil properties with strong variation with depth can result in substantial areas with much higher uncertainty that coincide with unrealistic predictions relative to 2D models, even though 3D models had slightly better global cross-validation scores. Maps and global model summaries of RPI proved helpful in identifying these issues with 3D models. These results suggest that the use of RPI or similar approaches to evaluate models can identify accuracy problems not evident in global validation diagnostics.
机译:土壤性能的精细规模地图使得有效的土地管理和通知地球系统模型。从现场观测创建土壤属性图的最新努力往往使用类似的基于树的机器学习插补方法,但通常会对预测,验证和不确定性的深度不同。方法的主要差异之一是单独将各个感兴趣的深度模拟为“2D”模型,或者创建将深度作为预测变量的模型创建可以对所有深度进行预测的“3D”模型。目前尚不清楚2D或3D方法的选择如何影响模型准确性和不确定性,由于缺乏直接比较和过去研究结果的结果不一致。该研究比较了2D和3D方法来映射土壤导电性(盐度),pH值,精细和非常细砂,以及在美国科罗拉多河流域的Colorado河流域的上部432,000 km(2)分辨率为30米的有机碳美国。提出了一种新的,简单的模型 - 不可逆境的相对预测间隔(RPI)方法来报告不确定度,其将预测间隔宽度缩放到原始训练样本分布的95%绕组宽度。 RPI方法可以直接比较性质和深度之间的不确定性,并且可以通过最终用户轻松解释。结果表明,在深度变化的情况下,3D映射具有强烈变化的土壤性质可以导致具有更高的不确定性,即使3D模型具有稍好更好的全局交叉验证分数,即使3D模型也与2D模型相对于不切实际的预测相符。 RPI的地图和全球模型摘要证明有助于识别3D模型的这些问题。这些结果表明,使用RPI或类似方法来评估模型可以识别全球验证诊断中不明显的准确性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号