...
首页> 外文期刊>Expert opinion on drug delivery >Ease of use of two autoinjectors in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with interferon beta-la subcutaneously three times weekly: results of the randomized, crossover REDEFINE study
【24h】

Ease of use of two autoinjectors in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with interferon beta-la subcutaneously three times weekly: results of the randomized, crossover REDEFINE study

机译:易于使用两种患者用干扰素β-la皮下治疗的多发性硬化患者三次:随机交叉的结果重新定义研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: For interferon beta-1a subcutaneously three times weekly (IFN ?1a SC tiw), administration options include manually injected prefllled syringes; a preassembled, single-use autoinjector; and a reusable autoinjector. This study evaluated patient-perceived ease of use of two injection devices. Research design and methods: REDEFINE, a Phase IV, multicenter crossover study, randomized patients with multiple sclerosis and e5 weeks' IFN ?1a 44 糶 SC tiw use to 4 weeks using a single-use autoinjector, then 4 weeks using a reusable autoinjector, or vice versa. The primary endpoint was the proportion rating each 'easy' or 'very easy', with/without regard to previous device experience. Results: Of 97 randomized patients, 29 had most recent experience with manual injection; 23 with single-use autoinjector; and 45 with reusable autoinjector. 68.4% found using the single-use autoinjector very easy or easy, versus 77.9% for the reusable device (difference -9.5%; p = 0.200). 40.0% versus 29.5% found the respective devices very easy (difference 10.5%; p = 0.203). Conclusions: Most patients found both autoinjectors easy or very easy to use. Having two viable options may help accommodate patient preferences. Ease of administration and patient satisfaction relates to adherence; satisfied patients may more likely be adherent.
机译:背景:对于干扰素β-1a皮下三次(IFNα1asc tiw),给药选项包括手动注入的前列注射器;预付款,单用自动注射器;和一个可重复使用的自动注射器。本研究评估了患者感知的两个注射装置的易用性。研究设计和方法:重新定义,第四阶段,多中心交叉研究,随机化患有多发性硬化症和E5周'IFN?1A 44粜SCTIW用于4周使用一次使用自动注射器,然后使用可重复使用的自动注入器4周,或相反亦然。主要终点是每个“轻松”或“非常容易”的比例,其中包含/不考虑以前的设备体验。结果:97例随机患者,29例具有最近的手动注射体验; 23单用自动注射器; 45和可重复使用的自动注入器。 68.4%发现使用单用自动注射器非常容易或简单,而可重用设备的77.9%(差异-9.5%; p = 0.200)。 40.0%与29.5%发现相应的设备非常容易(差异10.5%; P = 0.203)。结论:大多数患者发现自动注射器都容易或易于使用。拥有两个可行的选择可能有助于满足患者的偏好。易于行政和患者满意关系涉及遵守;满意的患者可能更有可能遵守。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号