首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Preliminary Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Needle-Embedding Therapy with Acupuncture for Atopic Dermatitis Patients
【24h】

Preliminary Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Needle-Embedding Therapy with Acupuncture for Atopic Dermatitis Patients

机译:针刺治疗针灸治疗针灸治疗患者的疗效和安全性初步比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives. Among Traditional Korean Medicine approaches, needle-embedding therapy is used in various fields and consistently studied; however, there have been no clinical studies of the treatment of adult atopic dermatitis (AD) with needle-embedding therapy. Thus, there is a need to investigate the effects of needle-embedding therapy for treatment of AD. This study was performed to identify possible effects of needle-embedding therapy at Quchi acupoint (LI11) on AD and to compare these effects with those of acupuncture therapy. Methods. A total of 14 participants were enrolled in this study. Participants received acupuncture or needle-embedding treatments for 4 weeks and then were followed for an additional 2 weeks because of safety assessment. The participants were divided into 2 groups: the acupuncture group, receiving treatment at Quchi acupoint (LI11) 3 times per week, and the needle-embedding group, receiving treatment at Quchi acupoint (LI11) once per week. The groups were compared on the basis of the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index, Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL), skin hydration, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline and 1 week after treatment was completed (5th week). Results. The SCORAD index, TEWL, Skin hydration, and DLQI at 1 week after treatment were significantly improved in both groups (p< 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the acupuncture and needle-embedding groups in any of the main evaluation indices (p >0.05). The study participants received a total of 84 acupuncture treatments or 28 needle-embedding treatments. No adverse events occurred during the study period. Conclusions. Based on changes in the SCORAD index, TEWL, skin hydration, and DLQI value, we found that both needle-embedding and acupuncture treatments at the Quchi acupoint (LI11) were effective in decreasing the symptoms of AD and exhibited similar therapeutic effects, which suggests that needle-embedding treatment maybe more clinically convenient than acupuncture, with longer effects and fewer treatments.
机译:目标。在传统的韩国医学方法中,针对各种领域的针嵌入治疗并一直研究;然而,没有针对针嵌入治疗的成人特应性皮炎(AD)的临床研究。因此,需要研究针对针对针对AD的针对治疗的影响。进行该研究以确定针对Quchi Acupoint(Li11)对广告上的针对治疗的可能影响,并与针灸治疗的效果比较。方法。本研究共有14名参与者。参与者在4周内获得针灸或针嵌入治疗,然后由于安全评估而持续2周。参与者分为2组:针灸组,每周3次接受Quchi Acupoint(Li11)的治疗,每周在Quchi Acupoint(Li11)处接受治疗。这些群体在基准的基准性皮炎(Scorad)指数(Scorad)指数,Transepidermal水分丧失(Tewl),皮肤水合和皮肤病学生命质量指数(DLQI)的基础上进行了比较,治疗后1周(第5周)。结果。在治疗后1周的Scorad指数,TEWL,皮肤水合和DLQI在两组中显着改善(P <0.05)。然而,在任何主要评估指标中的针灸和针嵌入组之间没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。研究参与者共收到84个针灸治疗或28个针刺治疗。在研究期间没有发生不良事件。结论。基于Scorad指数,TEWL,皮肤水合和DLQI值的变化,我们发现Quchi穴位(LI11)的针脚和针灸治疗都有效降低广告的症状并表现出类似的治疗效果,这表明针对嵌入治疗可能比针灸更方便,较长的效果和处理较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号