首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Evaluation of How Integrative Oncology Services Are Valued between Hematology/Oncology Patients and Hematologists/Oncologists at a Tertiary Care Center
【24h】

Evaluation of How Integrative Oncology Services Are Valued between Hematology/Oncology Patients and Hematologists/Oncologists at a Tertiary Care Center

机译:评价综合肿瘤学服务如何在血液学/肿瘤学患者和血液学师/肿瘤学家在第三级护理中心进行重视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence regarding opinions on integrative modalities by patients and physicians is lacking. Methods. A survey study was conducted assessing how integrative modalities were valued among hematology/oncology patients and hematologists and oncologists at a major tertiary medical center. Results. 1008 patients and 55 physicians were surveyed. With the exception of support groups, patients valued nutrition services, exercise therapy, spiritual/religious counseling, supplement/herbal advice, support groups, music therapy, and other complimentary medicine services significantly more than physicians (P <= 0.05). Conclusion. With the exception of support groups, patients value integrative modalities more than physicians. Perhaps with increasing education, awareness, and acceptance by providers and traditional institutions, integrative modalities could be equally valued between patients and providers. It is possible that increased availability and utilization of integrative oncology modalities at tertiary hospital sites could improve patient satisfaction, quality of life, and other clinical endpoints.
机译:缺乏有关患者和医生综合模式的意见的证据。方法。进行了调查研究,评估了在主要高等教育中心的血液学/肿瘤学患者和血液学医生和肿瘤学家中综合的方式。结果。接受了1008名患者和55名医生。除支持群体外,患者有价值的营养服务,运动治疗,精神/宗教咨询,补充/草药建议,支持群体,音乐治疗和其他免费医学服务明显多于医生(P <= 0.05)。结论。除了支持群体外,患者比医生更加综合方式。也许随着供应商和传统机构的增加,意识和接受,患者和提供者之间的综合方式可能同样重视。第三节医院部位综合肿瘤型号的可用性和利用率增加可能会改善患者满意度,生活质量和其他临床终点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号