...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >The Traditional Chinese Medicine and Relevant Treatment for the Efficacy and Safety of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

The Traditional Chinese Medicine and Relevant Treatment for the Efficacy and Safety of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:中医与特应性皮炎疗效和安全性的相关治疗:随机对照试验的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Atopic dermatitis (AD) has become a common skin disease that requires systematic and comprehensive treatment to achieve adequate clinical control. Traditional Chinese medicines and related treatments have shown clinical effects for AD in many studies. But the systematic reviews and meta-analyses for them are lacking. Objective. The systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicines and related treatments for AD treatment. Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched based on standardized searching rules in eight medical databases from the inception up to December 2016 and a total of 24 articles with 1,618 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Results. The results revealed that traditional Chinese medicines and related treatments did not show statistical differences in clinical effectiveness, SCORAD amelioration, and SSRI amelioration for AD treatment compared with control group. However, EASI amelioration of traditional Chinese medicines and related treatments for AD was superior to control group. Conclusion. We need to make conclusion cautiously for the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine and related treatment on AD therapy. More standard, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine and related treatment for AD were required to be conducted for more clinical evidences providing in the future.
机译:背景。特应性皮炎(AD)已成为一种常见的皮肤病,需要进行系统和全面的治疗,以达到足够的临床控制。中药和相关治疗在许多研究中显示了广告的临床效果。但是,缺乏系统的评价和荟萃分析。客观的。进行了基于系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明的系统审查和荟萃分析,以评估中药和相关治疗的疗效和安全性。方法。根据2016年12月的八个医疗数据库中的标准化搜查规则进行了随机对照试验(RCT),并在该荟萃分析中注册了共有1,618名患者的24条。结果。结果表明,与对照组相比,中药和相关治疗没有显示出临床效果,Scorad改善和SSRI改善的统计差异。然而,EASI改善了中药的改善和AD相关治疗优于对照组。结论。我们需要对中医药的疗效和安全性以及对AD治疗的相关治疗进行结论。需要进行更多标准,多中心,双盲随机对照试验(RCT)的中药及相关治疗,以便在未来提供的更多临床证据。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Fourth Mil Med Univ Xijing Hosp Dept Tradit Chinese Med Xian 710032 Peoples R China;

    Xian City Hosp Tradit Chinese Med Dept Orthopaed Xian 710021 Peoples R China;

    Fourth Mil Med Univ Xijing Hosp Dept Tradit Chinese Med Xian 710032 Peoples R China;

    Fourth Mil Med Univ Xijing Hosp Dept Tradit Chinese Med Xian 710032 Peoples R China;

    Fourth Mil Med Univ Xijing Hosp Dept Tradit Chinese Med Xian 710032 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号