...
首页> 外文期刊>Games and economic behavior >When are efficient and fair assignment mechanisms group strategy-proof?
【24h】

When are efficient and fair assignment mechanisms group strategy-proof?

机译:什么时候有效和公平的任务机制组战略证明?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the house allocation model, the literature (Bade, 2016; Zhang, 2019) have proven impossibility theorems regarding the compatibility of efficiency, fairness, and group non-manipulability if agents' preferences are unrestricted. Since in many applications not all preferences are possible, this paper examines to what extent these theorems still hold on restricted preference domains. We find that these theorems still hold unless the domains are restricted to have a special tier structure. We present several possibility theorems when the number of objects is restricted or when preference domains are restricted. This paper clarifies how strong the existing impossibility theorems actually are. As corollaries, we clarify the group incentive properties of Random Priority and Probabilistic Serial, the two mechanisms at the center of many studies. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在房屋配置模型中,文学(Bade,2016; Zhang,2019)已经证明了关于效率,公平性和群体不可制约性的兼容性,如果代理人的偏好是不受限制的兼容性的不可能性定理。 由于在许多应用中并非所有偏好都是可能的,因此本文审查了这些定理仍然在禁区偏好域中的程度。 我们发现这些定理仍然持有,除非域名被限制为具有特殊的层结构。 当物体的数量受到限制或限制偏好域时,我们提供了几种可能性定理。 本文阐明了现有的不影响定理实际上有多强劲。 作为冠状体,我们澄清了随机优先级和概率串行的组激励性质,这是许多研究中心的两个机制。 (c)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号