...
首页> 外文期刊>Games and economic behavior >Competition with an information clearinghouse and asymmetric firms: Why more than two firms compete (or not) for shoppers
【24h】

Competition with an information clearinghouse and asymmetric firms: Why more than two firms compete (or not) for shoppers

机译:与信息交换所和不对称公司的竞争:为什么两个以上的公司竞争(或不)购物者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We characterize equilibria of a market in which firms with asymmetric loyal customer bases can pay a fixed cost to advertise prices through an information clearinghouse to compete for shoppers. We find that the magnitude of the advertising cost and differences in the sizes of the firms' loyal market shares are critical in determining which firms compete for shoppers in equilibrium. If the advertising cost is sufficiently low, then only the two firms with the smallest loyal market shares advertise and compete for shoppers. However, in contrast to earlier literature, more than two firms compete for shoppers if the advertising cost is sufficiently large and the difference in loyal market shares is sufficiently small. In addition, the advertising probability decreases in the size of the firm's loyal customer base, but larger firms price more competitively when they do advertise. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:我们的特征在于使用不对称忠诚客户基地的公司的均衡,可以通过信息清算室宣传购物者来支付固定成本。 我们发现,公司忠诚市场份额大小的广告成本和差异在确定哪些公司竞争均衡时至关重要。 如果广告成本足够低,那么只有两家拥有最小的忠诚市场份额的公司宣传和竞争购物者。 然而,与早期的文献相比,如果广告成本足够大,忠诚的市场份额的差异足够小,两家公司都超过两家公司竞争购物者。 此外,广告概率在公司忠诚的客户群的规模下降,但在他们做广告时更大的公司价格更大。 (c)2020 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号