首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: A nationwide comparative cohort study
【24h】

Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: A nationwide comparative cohort study

机译:一项全国比较队列研究,与计划进行紧急剖腹产的孕妇相比,计划在第一胎剖腹产后的后续妊娠中发生母婴和新生儿并发症的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To compare the difference in risks of neonatal and maternal complications, including uterine rupture, in a second birth following a planned caesarean section versus emergency caesarean section in the first birth. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Population-based cohort in the Netherlands. Population Linked data set of outcomes for term caesarean section in a first birth followed by a consecutive delivery. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort analysis using data from the Dutch Perinatal Registry. We included primiparous women who gave birth to term singleton infants through planned or emergency caesarean from January 2000 through December 2007, and who had a second singleton delivery during the same period (n = 41 109). Odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios were calculated. Main outcome measures Maternal and neonatal complications, specifically uterine rupture, in second births associated with planned and emergency caesareans in the first birth. Results Women with a history of a planned caesarean section in the first birth (n = 11 445) had a 0.24% risk for uterine rupture, compared with a 0.16% risk for women with a history of emergency caesarean section (n = 29 664; aOR 1.4, 95% CI 0.8-2.4). In multivariate logistic regression, women with planned caesareans in a first birth had a significantly increased risk of stillbirth (aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2) and postpartum haemorrhage (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2) in second births, compared with women with emergency caesareans in the first birth. Conclusions We found a moderately increased risk of postpartum haemorrhage and a small to moderately increased risk of uterine rupture and stillbirth as a long-term effect of prior planned caesarean delivery on second births.
机译:目的比较计划剖宫产后的第二胎和第一胎急诊剖宫产在新生儿和孕妇并发症(包括子宫破裂)风险上的差异。设计前瞻性队列研究。在荷兰设置基于人群的队列。人口相关的数据集,用于在第一胎中进行足月剖腹产的结果,然后是连续分娩。方法我们使用荷兰围产期注册中心的数据进行了前瞻性队列分析。我们纳入了从2000年1月至2007年12月通过计划或紧急剖腹产产足月单胎婴儿并在同一时期分娩第二胎的初产妇女(n = 41 109)。计算赔率和调整后的赔率。主要结局指标与第一胎计划和紧急剖腹产相关的第二胎孕妇和新生儿并发症,特别是子宫破裂。结果首次剖腹产史(n = 11 44​​5)的女性发生子宫破裂的风险为0.24%,而有紧急剖腹产史的妇女(n = 29664; 2011年)为0.16%。 aOR 1.4,95%CI 0.8-2.4)。在多因素logistic回归分析中,与第一胎相比,计划生育的妇女在第一胎中死产(aOR 1.5,95%CI 1.0-2.2)和产后出血的风险(aOR 1.1,95%CI 1.0-1.2)明显增加。与第一胎中有紧急剖腹产的妇女。结论我们发现产后出血的风险适度增加,而子宫破裂和死产的风险略有增加,这是先前计划剖腹产对第二胎的长期影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号