首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial
【2h】

Birth after caesarean study – planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial

机译:剖腹产后出生–曾有一次剖腹产的足月孕妇计划进行阴道分娩或计划进行选择性剖腹产:患者偏爱研究和随机试验的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundFor women who have a caesarean section in their preceding pregnancy, two care policies for birth are considered standard: planned vaginal birth and planned elective repeat caesarean. Currently available information about the benefits and harms of both forms of care are derived from retrospective and prospective cohort studies. There have been no randomised trials, and recognising the deficiencies in the literature, there have been calls for methodologically rigorous studies to assess maternal and infant health outcomes associated with both care policies.The aims of our study are to assess in women with a previous caesarean birth, who are eligible in the subsequent pregnancy for a vaginal birth, whether a policy of planned vaginal birth after caesarean compared with a policy of planned repeat caesarean affects the risk of serious complications for the woman and her infant.
机译:背景技术对于在怀孕前进行剖腹产的妇女,两种生育政策被认为是标准的:计划内的阴道分娩和计划内的选择性重复剖腹产。有关两种医疗形式的利弊的当前可用信息来自回顾性和前瞻性队列研究。尚无随机试验,并且认识到文献中的不足,因此呼吁进行严格的方法学研究,以评估与两种护理政策相关的母婴健康结局。本研究的目的是评估先前剖腹产的妇女谁有资格在其后的妊娠中进行阴道分娩,是否将剖宫产后计划阴道分娩的政策与计划重复剖腹产的政策相比较是否会影响该妇女及其婴儿发生严重并发症的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号