...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size
【24h】

Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size

机译:在手附近的声音有助于触觉反应时间吗? 四个实验和Meta分析提供混合支持并表明效果小

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The brain represents the space immediately surrounding the body differently to more distant parts of space. Direct evidence for this 'peripersonal space' representation comes from neurophysiological studies in monkeys, which show distance-dependent responses to visual stimuli in neurons with spatially coincident tactile responses. Most evidence for peripersonal space in humans is indirect: spatial- and distance-dependent modulations of reaction times and error rates in behavioural tasks. In one task often used to assess peripersonal space, sounds near the body have been argued to speed reactions to tactile stimuli. We conducted four experiments attempting to measure this distance-dependent audiotactile interaction. We found no distance-dependent enhancement of tactile processing in error rates or task performance, but found some evidence for a general speeding of reaction times by 9.5 ms when sounds were presented near the hand. A systematic review revealed an overestimation of reported effect sizes, lack of control conditions, a wide variety of methods, post hoc removal of data, and flexible methods of data analysis. After correcting for the speed of sound, removing biased or inconclusive studies, correcting for temporal expectancy, and using the trim-and-fill method to correct for publication bias, meta-analysis revealed an overall benefit of 15.2 ms when tactile stimuli are accompanied by near sounds compared to sounds further away. While this effect may be due to peripersonal space, response probability and the number of trials per condition explained significant proportions of variance in this near versus far benefit. These confounds need to be addressed, and alternative explanations ruled out by future, ideally pre-registered, studies.
机译:大脑代表立即围绕身体的空间与更远的空间部分不同。这种“脉搏空间”代表的直接证据来自猴子的神经生理学研究,其显示在具有空间巧妙的触觉反应的神经元中对视觉刺激的距离依赖性反应。人类在人类脉搏空间的大多数证据是间接的:行为任务中的反应时间和误差率的空间和距离依赖性调制。在一个经常用于评估脉搏空间的一项任务中,已经认为身体附近的声音是对触觉刺激的反应。我们进行了四个实验,试图测量该距离依赖性触觉互动。我们发现无距离依赖性增强触觉加工,以误差率或任务性能,但发现一些证据在手中呈现出色时,在发出声音时,对反应时间的一般加速。系统审查显示报告的效果大小,缺乏控制条件,各种方法,数据分析的灵活方法,缺乏控制条件,缺乏控制条件,以及软化方法。纠正声速,去除偏差或不确定的研究,纠正时间寿命,并使用Trim-and-填充方法来纠正出版物偏见,Meta分析显示,当触觉刺激伴随时,术语展示了15.2毫秒的整体益处与声音附近的声音相比,听起来更远。虽然这种效果可能是由于脉搏空间,响应概率和每个条件的试验次数都解释了这种近似的差异与远远效益的显着比例。需要解决这些混乱,并通过未来的替代解释,理想地预先注册,研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号