首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >Perspectives of civil society on governance of urban shrinkage: the cases of Heerlen (Netherlands) and Blaenau Gwent (Wales) compared
【24h】

Perspectives of civil society on governance of urban shrinkage: the cases of Heerlen (Netherlands) and Blaenau Gwent (Wales) compared

机译:城市萎缩治理民间社会的观点:Heerlen(荷兰)和Blaenau Gwent(威尔士)的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In light of the ongoing urban shrinkage debate, planners stressed the need for new planning concepts and strategies. In this respect, the relevance of involving civil society in governance of urban shrinkage has been emphasized. So far, however these issues have received limited attention. This paper aims to contribute to the debate by investigating (1) how actors in civil society experience urban shrinkage and (2) their perspectives on the governance of urban shrinkage. We study this in two shrinking medium-sized cities: Heerlen (the Netherlands) and Blaenau Gwent (Wales). To answer these research questions, we make use of the concept of social capital. We follow a comparative case study design, primarily basing the analysis on data from 52 in-depth interviews. In the case studies, specific patterns of social capital can be observed: strong place attachment, strong informal participation and weak trust of civil society in local governments. However, the experience of urban shrinkage and the reaction to shrinkage differs. We conclude that understanding shrinkage and addressing it are predominately context related. Explanations based on historical developments and welfare state provisions are offered. The paper ends with reflections on the implications of these findings for governance of urban shrinkage.
机译:鉴于持续的城市萎缩辩论,规划者强调了需要新的规划概念和策略。在这方面,强调了涉及民间社会在城市收缩治理中的相关性。到目前为止,这些问题受到了有限的关注。本文旨在通过调查(1)民间社会如何经历城市萎缩和(2)对城市萎缩治理的观点来促进辩论。我们在两个萎缩的中型城市中研究:Heerlen(荷兰)和Blaenau Gwent(威尔士)。要回答这些研究问题,我们利用了社会资本的概念。我们遵循比较案例研究设计,主要基于52深入访谈的数据分析。在案例研究中,可以观察到社会资本的具体模式:在地方政府在地方政府的强大的依恋,强大的非正式参与和弱信任。然而,城市收缩的经验和对收缩的反应不同。我们得出结论,了解收缩和解决它主要是相关的。提供了基于历史发展和福利国家条款的解释。本文以思考这些调查结果对城市收缩治理的影响结束。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号