Radiofrequency ablation for subcardiac hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic outcomes and risk factors for technical failure

摘要

ObjectivesTo compare the therapeutic outcomes and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for subcardiac and non-subcardiac hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate the risk factors for technical failure of the procedure.MethodsThis retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Between September 2002 and May 2016, 73 patients with subcardiac HCC and the same number of patients with non-subcardiac HCC matched by tumor size were included. Subcardiac HCC was defined as an index tumor that was located 1cm from the pericardium in axial or coronal images. Cumulative local tumor progression (LTP) was compared between the two groups using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors for technical failure were assessed using multivariable logistic analysis.ResultsTechnical success rates between both groups were not significantly different (91.8% in the subcardiac HCC group vs. 95.9% in the non-subcardiac HCC group; p=0.494). The cumulative LTP rates were 15.4% and 19.1% at 3 and 5years, respectively, in the subcardiac HCC group, and 10.7% and 15.5% in the non-subcardiac HCC group, without significant difference (p=0.862). The distance between the index tumor and pericardium (odds ratio [OR], 0.14; p=0.023) and tumor in segment IV (reference, left lateral sector; OR, 36.53; p=0.029) were significant factors for technical failure in patients with subcardiac HCC.ConclusionsRF ablation was an effective treatment for subcardiac HCC. However, tumor location should be considered in the planning of treatment to avoid technical failure.Key Points center dot RF ablation for subcardiac HCC is technically feasible without major complications.center dot RF ablation was an effective treatment for subcardiac HCC in terms of LTP.center dot Risk factors for technical failure were distance of the index tumor from the heart (cutoff value of 0.5cm) and the location of the tumor (segment IV).