首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Reducing repeat paediatric emergency department attendance for non-urgent care: a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
【24h】

Reducing repeat paediatric emergency department attendance for non-urgent care: a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions

机译:减少重复的儿科急诊部门出席非紧急护理:对干预措施有效性的系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Non-urgent paediatric ED (PED) visits appear to contribute a large portion to the growing use of EDs globally. Several interventions have tried to curb repeated non-urgent attendances, but no systematic review of their effectiveness exists. This review examines the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce subsequent non-urgent PED visits after a non-urgent attendance.A systematic review design. A systematic search of four databases and key journals was conducted from their inception to November 2018. Experimental studies, involving children aged 0–18 years presenting to an ED for non-urgent care, which assessed the effectiveness of interventions on subsequent non-urgent attendance were considered.2120 studies were identified. Six studies, including four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two quasi-experimental, were included. Studies were of moderate quality methodologically. All studies originated from the USA and involved informational and/or follow-up support interventions. Only two RCTs demonstrated the longest duration of intervention effects on reducing subsequent non-urgent PED attendance. These studies identified participants retrospectively after ED evaluation. The RCT with the largest number of participants involved follow-up support by primary physicians. Meta-analysis was impractical due to wide heterogeneity of the interventions.There is inconclusive evidence to support any intervention aimed at reducing subsequent non-urgent PED visits following a non-urgent attendance. The long-term impact of interventions is limited, although the effect may be maximised if delivered by primary care providers in children identified after their ED attendance. However, further research is required to evaluate the impact of any such strategies in settings outside the USA.
机译:非紧急儿科ED(PED)访问似乎为全球越来越多的EDS贡献提供了大部分。一些干预措施试图遏制反复的非紧急出席,但没有对其有效性的系统审查。本综述审查了旨在在非紧急出席后减少随后的非紧急PED访问的干预措施的有效性。系统审查设计。对四个数据库和关键期刊的系统搜索是从他们开始到2018年11月的初始化。实验研究,涉及0-18岁的儿童提交给非紧急护理,这评估了干预措施对随后的非紧急出席的有效性被认为是确定的研究。包括六项研究,包括四种随机对照试验(RCT)和两种准实验性。研究的方法论是适度的。所有研究源于美国,并涉及信息和/或后续支持干预措施。只有两个RCT证明了对减少随后的非紧急PED出勤率的最长持续时间。这些研究在ED评估后回顾性地确定了参与者。与参与者数量最多的RCT涉及主要医生的后续支持。由于干预措施的广泛异质性,Meta分析是不切实际的。如果不确定的证据证明,支持在非紧急出席后旨在减少随后的非紧急PED访问的任何干预。干预措施的长期影响是有限的,尽管如果在其ed出席后发现的儿童中的初级护理提供者提供的效果可能会最大化。但是,需要进一步的研究来评估任何此类策略在美国以外的环境中的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号