...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Preparation for the next major incident: are we ready? A 12-year update
【24h】

Preparation for the next major incident: are we ready? A 12-year update

机译:准备下一个主要事件:我们准备好了吗? 一个12年的更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A major incident is any emergency that requires special arrangements by the emergency services and generally involves a large number of people. Recent such events in England have included the Manchester Arena bombing and the Grenfell Tower disaster. Hospitals are required by law to keep a major incident plan (MIP) outlining the response to such an event. In a survey conducted in 2006 we found a substantial knowledge gap among key individuals that would be expected to respond to the enactment of an MIP. We set out to repeat this survey study and assess any improvement since our original report.We identified NHS trusts in England that received more than 30?000 patients through the emergency department in the fourth quarter of the 2016/2017 period. We contacted the on-call anaesthetic, emergency, general surgery, and trauma and orthopaedic registrar at each location and asked each individual to answer a short verbal survey assessing their confidence in using their hospital’s MIP.Of those eligible for the study, 62% were able to be contacted and consented to the study. In total 50% of respondents had read all or part of their hospital’s MIP, 46.8% were confident that they knew where their plan was stored, and 36% knew the role they would play if a plan came into effect. These results show less confidence among middle-grade doctors compared with 2006.Confidence in using MIPs among specialty registrars in England is still low. In light of this, we make a number of recommendations designed to improve the education of hospital doctors in reacting to major incidents.
机译:主要事件是任何需要应急服务的特殊安排的紧急情况,并且通常涉及大量的人。最近在英格兰这样的事件包括曼彻斯特竞技场轰炸和格林芬塔塔的灾难。法律要求医院保留一项重大事件(MIP)概述对此类活动的回应。在2006年进行的一项调查中,我们发现了重点个人之间的实质性知识差距,预计将响应MIP的制定。我们旨在重复这项调查研究,并以自2016/2017期间通过急诊部门获得超过30名患者的英格兰确定NHS信任以来,评估任何改进。我们在每个地点联系了随叫呼吸的麻醉,紧急,普通手术和创伤和骨科注册商,并要求每个人回答一项短暂的口头调查,评估他们在使用医院的MIP方面的信心。符合参考资件的人,62%是62%能够联系并同意这项研究。总共50%的受访者阅读了他们的全部或部分医院的MIP,46.8%相信他们知道他们的计划在储存的地方,如果计划生效,36%就会了解他们会发挥作用。这些结果与2006年相比,中年医生之间的信心较低。在英格兰的专业注册商中使用MIPS的基金仍然很低。鉴于此,我们制定了一些建议,旨在改善医院医生的教育对主要事件的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号