...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society >Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:对症状腰椎间盘突出症不同点切除术技术的并发率:系统综述与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose This meta-analysis aims to compare the complication rates of discectomy/microdiscectomy (OD/MD), microendoscopic discectomy (MED), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD), and tubular discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) using general classification and modified Clavien-Dindo classification (MCDC) schemes. Methods We searched three online databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Overall complication rates and complication rates per the above-mentioned classification schemes were considered as primary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were evaluated. Results Seventeen RCTs and 20 cohort studies met the eligibility criteria. RCTs reporting OD/MD, MED, PELD, PLDD, and tubular discectomies had overall complication rates of 16.8% and 16.1%, 21.2%, 5.8%, 8.4%, and 25.8%, respectively. Compared with the OD/MD, there was moderate-quality evidence suggesting that PELD had a lower risk of overall complications (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.91) and high-quality evidence suggesting a lower risk of Type I complications per MCDC (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.81). Compared with the OD/MD data from cohort studies, there was low-quality evidence suggesting a higher risk of Type III complications per MCDC (RR = 10.83, 95% CI 1.29-91.18) for MED, higher risk of reherniations (RR = 1.67,95% CI 1.05-2.64) and reoperations (RR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.20-2.55) for PELD, lower risk of overall complication rates (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.70), post-operative complication rates (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.70), Type III complications per MCDC (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.69), reherniations (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.97) and reoperations (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22-0.69) for PLDD. Conclusions Compared with the OD/MD, results of this meta-analysis suggest that PELD has a lower risk of overall complications and a lower risk of complications necessitating conservative treatment.
机译:目的,该元分析旨在比较点切除术/微量药物切除术(OD / MD)的并发症率,微观镜片点切除术(MED),经皮内窥镜腰椎切除术(PELD),经皮激光椎间盘减压(PLDD)和对症状腰椎间盘的管状椎间盘切除术使用一般分类和修改的Clavien-DINDO分类(MCDC)方案的疝气(LDH)。方法我们搜索了三个在线数据库,用于随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究。每个上述分类方案的整体并发症率和并发症率被视为主要结果。评估风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。结果17个RCT和20个裁群研究达到了资格标准。 RCT报告OD / MD,MED,PELD,PLDD和管状指数的整体并发症率分别为16.8%和16.1%,分别为21.2%,5.8%,8.4%和25.8%。与OD / MD相比,有中等质量的证据表明PELD的整体并发症风险较低(RR = 0.52,95%CI 0.29-0.91)和高质量证据,表明每MCDC的I型并发症风险较低(RR = 0.37,95%CI 0.16-0.81)。与来自队列研究的OD / MD数据相比,有低质量的证据表明每MCDC的III型并发症的风险较高(RR = 10.83,95%CI 1.29-9-9-9-9-91.18),更高的reainniations(RR = 1.67 PELD的95%CI 1.05-2.64)和重新进展(RR = 1.75,95%CI 1.20-2.55),较低的整体并发症率的风险降低(RR = 0.42,95%CI 0.25-0.70),术后并发症率( RR = 0.42,95%CI 0.25-0.70),III型并发症每MCDC(RR = 0.39,95%CI 0.22-0.69),REIANIATIONS(RR = 0.56,95%CI 0.33-0.97)和重新进展(RR = 0.39,用于PLDD的95%CI 0.22-0.69)。结论与OD / MD相比,该荟萃分析的结果表明,PELD具有较低的整体并发症风险和较低的并发症风险较低,需要保守治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号