首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society >Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity
【24h】

Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity

机译:成人脊柱畸形外科决策得分。 第2部分:分量系统的开发和验证指导成人脊柱畸形40岁以上患者的治疗方式选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PurposeWe aimed to develop and internally validate a scoring system, the adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making (ASD-SDM) score, to guide the decision-making process for ASD patients aged above 40 years.MethodsA multicentre prospective ASD database was retrospectively reviewed. The scoring system was developed using data from a derivation set and was internally validated in a validation set. The performance of the ASD-SDM score for predicting surgical management was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsA total of 702 patients were included for analysis in the present study. The scoring system developed based on 562 patients, ranging from 0 to 12 points, included five parameters: leg pain scored by the numerical rating scale; pain and self-image domains in the Scoliosis Research Society-22 score; coronal Cobb angle; and relative spinopelvic alignment. Surgical indication was graded as low (score 0 to 4), moderate (score 5 to 7), and high (score 8 to 12) groups. In the validation set of 140 patients, the AUC for predicting surgical management according to the ASD-SDM score was 0.797 (standard error=0.037, P<0.001, 95% confidence interval=0.714 to 0.861), and in the low, moderate, and high surgical indication groups, 23.7%, 43.5%, and 80.4% of the patients, respectively, were treated surgically.ConclusionsThe ASD-SDM score demonstrated reliability, with higher scores indicating a higher probability of surgery. This index could aid in the selection of surgery for ASD patients in clinical settings.
机译:目的旨在开发和内部验证得分系统,成年脊柱畸形外科决策(ASD-SDM)得分,指导40年以上患者的ASD患者的决策过程。一点回顾性审查。评分系统是使用来自派生集的数据开发的,并在验证集中内部验证。使用接收器操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积评估了用于预测手术管理的ASD-SDM评分的性能。评估702名患者的患者分析。评分系统根据562名患者开发,范围从0到12分,包括五个参数:由数值评定量表评分的腿部疼痛;脊柱侧凸研究室的痛苦和自我形象域-22分数;冠状角角;和相对旋尖髓相对。手术指示较低(得分0至4),中等(得分5至7),高(得分8至12)组。在140名患者的验证组中,根据ASD-SDM评分预测手术管理的AUC为0.797(标准误差= 0.037,P <0.001,95%置信区间= 0.714至0.861),并且在低,中等,中等,并且,高手术指示群,分别为23.7%,43.5%和80.4%的患者进行手术治疗.Clusionsthe ASD-SDM评分证明可靠性,得分更高,表明手术较高概率。该指数可以帮助选择临床环境中ASD患者的手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号