首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine Australasia: EMA >Opioid prescribing in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital: A retrospective audit of hospital discharge data
【24h】

Opioid prescribing in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital: A retrospective audit of hospital discharge data

机译:一家高级医院急诊部门的阿片类药物:医院放电数据的回顾性审计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objective EDs are a common source of prescription opioids on discharge. We explored opioid prescribing practices in an ED at a tertiary hospital in Victoria, Australia. Methods A retrospective audit over a 6 month period of patients discharged from the ED to the community with the maximum allowable quantities of prescription opioids. Results There was a total of 3301 patient‐episodes discharged with a prescription from the ED. Of these, 766 (23.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.8–24.6) were prescribed opioids, with over half discharged with the maximum allowable quantities of prescription opioids. Immediate‐release opioids were prescribed in 362 (85.8%, 95% CI 82.5–89.1) patient‐episodes, a combination of immediate‐release and slow‐release preparations were prescribed in 29 (6.9%, 95% CI 4.5–9.3) and 31 (7.3%, 95% CI 4.8–9.8) were prescribed as slow‐release opioids alone. Co‐prescription of other analgesia with opioids occurred in 152 (36.0%, 95% CI 31.4–40.6) patient‐episodes. Possible drug interactions between opioids and other medications were noted in 117 (27.7%, 95% CI 23.4–32.0) patient‐episodes. Discharge summaries were prepared for 360 (85.3%, 95% CI 81.9–88.7) patient‐episodes, but only 171 (40.5%, 95% CI 35.8–45.2) included a plan to address the opioids, be that an opioid‐weaning regimen, analgesia review or referral to a pain specialist on discharge. Conclusion Opioid prescribing was common in this ED, with almost one‐quarter of discharge prescriptions being for a prescription opioid. This audit highlights potential areas for practice improvement including review of the quantity of opioid tablets prescribed as well as an opioid plan on discharge from the ED.
机译:摘要目的EDS是出院时处方阿片类药物的常见来源。我们探讨了澳大利亚维多利亚大学医院的Apioid处方实践。方法对从ED到社区排出的6个月内的回顾性审计,具有最大允许的处方阿片类药物。结果总共有3301集的患者发作,用ED处方。其中766例(23.2%,95%置信区间[CI] 21.8-24.6)被规定了阿片类药物,超过一半放电,具有最大允许的处方阿片类药物。立即释放的阿片类药物在362中规定(85.8%,95%CI 82.5-89.1)患者发作,立即释放和缓释制剂的组合在29例(6.9%,95%CI 4.5-9.3)和仅规定31(7.3%,95%CI 4.8-9.8)作为单独的缓慢释放阿片类药物。与阿片类药物的其他镇痛的共同处方发生在152例(36.0%,95%CI 31.4-40.6)患者发作中。在117(27.7%,95%CI 23.4-32.0)患者发作中,注意到阿片类药物和其他药物之间的可能药物相互作用。为360(85.3%,95%CI 81.9-88.7)制备了排出摘要,但患者发作,但只有171(40.5%,95%CI 35.8-45.2)包括一个解决阿片类药物的计划,是阿片类断奶方案,镇痛审查或转诊放入止痛药。结论阿片类药物在该ED中很常见,几乎四分之一的放电处方为处方阿片类药物。该审计突出了实践改进的潜在领域,包括审查规定的阿片类药物的数量以及从ED排出的阿片类药物计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号