...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis: an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis >Effects of pre-analytical variables on the anti-activated factor X chromogenic assay when monitoring unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation.
【24h】

Effects of pre-analytical variables on the anti-activated factor X chromogenic assay when monitoring unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation.

机译:监测未分级肝素和低分子量肝素抗凝剂时,分析前变量对抗活化因子X生色测定的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the anti-activated factor X (anti-FXa) assay is less affected by pre-analytical variables in monitoring patients on unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) than the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Forty-six subjects receiving either enoxaparin (LMWH) or UFH were randomly selected. Each study subject had six vacutainer tubes (3.8% sodium citrate, 3.2% sodium citrate) drawn by an atraumatic venipuncture. One tube from each set had a blood to anticoagulant ratio of 9: 1. The other tube had an intentional "short-draw" of approximately 6: 1 blood to anticoagulant ratio. All specimens had an aPTT and a chromogenic anti-FXa assay performed on each specimen regardless of heparin type. The aPTT assay mean with the 3.8% sodium citrate tube short-draw tube was statistically different from the other aPTT assays (P = 0.06). However, all six of the mean anti-FXa assays for the UFH and LMWH heparin subjects were not statistically or clinically different (analysis of variance, P = 0.9878 for UFH and P = 0.9060 for LMWH). The intentional short-draw tube did not affect the anti-FXa assay regardless of the anticoagulant. The anti-FXa assay appears to be a better method for monitoring heparin subjects than the aPTT due to the lack of effect of pre-analytical variables.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定在监测普通肝素(UFH)和低分子量肝素(LMWH)患者时,分析前变量对抗活化因子X(anti-FXa)检测的影响是否小于活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)。随机选择接受依诺肝素(LMWH)或UFH的46名受试者。每个研究对象通过无创性静脉穿刺抽出六个真空管(3.8%柠檬酸钠,3.2%柠檬酸钠)。每组中的一个试管的血液与抗凝剂之比为9:1。另一支试管的故意“抽取”为约6:1的血液与抗凝剂之比。无论肝素类型如何,所有标本均进行了aPTT和生色抗FXa分析。 3.8%柠檬酸钠试管短拉管的aPTT测定平均值与其他aPTT测定在统计学上不同(P = 0.06)。但是,UFH和LMWH肝素受试者的全部六种平均抗FXa检测没有统计学或临床差异(方差分析,UFH P = 0.9878,LMWH P = 0.9060)。不管使用哪种抗凝剂,有意使用的短管都不会影响抗FXa分析。由于缺乏分析前变量的影响,抗-FXa分析似乎比aPTT是监测肝素受试者的更好方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号