首页> 外文期刊>European journal of preventive cardiology >Cost-effectiveness of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin versus aspirin alone in people with peripheral or carotid artery disease: An Australian healthcare perspective
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin versus aspirin alone in people with peripheral or carotid artery disease: An Australian healthcare perspective

机译:低剂量蓖麻油和阿司匹林与阿司匹林的成本效果单独患有外周或颈动脉疾病的人:澳大利亚医疗保健的角度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims Peripheral artery disease affects 1.2% of the population globally and is associated with an increased risk of atherothrombotic cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events and mortality. The Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anti-coagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial demonstrated positive results of rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy compared to aspirin therapy alone in those with peripheral artery disease or carotid artery disease. We sought to estimate the cost-effectiveness from the Australian healthcare system perspective. Methods and results A Markov model was developed to simulate the experiences of a hypothetical population of 1000 individuals with peripheral artery disease or carotid artery disease, profiled on the COMPASS trial, treated with rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy versus aspirin therapy alone. With each annual cycle, individuals were at risk of having non-fatal cardiovascular disease events, major adverse limb events, or dying. Individuals were also at risk of non-fatal major bleeding. The model had a lifetime time horizon. Costs and utilities were sourced from the literature and discounted at 5.0% annually. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy prevented 143 non-fatal cardiovascular disease events, 118 major adverse limb events and 10 deaths compared to aspirin therapy alone. Conversely, 156 additional major non-fatal bleeds were accrued. With an additional 256 quality-adjusted life years gained, at an additional cost of AUD$6,858,103, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was AUD$26,769 (discounted) per quality-adjusted life year gained, which is below Australia's arbitrary willingness to pay threshold of AUD$50,000. Conclusion In those with peripheral artery disease or carotid artery disease, rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy is effective and cost-effective in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease compared to aspirin therapy alone.
机译:AIMS外周动脉疾病影响全球人口的1.2%,并且与动脉粥样硬化心血管事件的风险增加,主要不良肢体事件和死亡率有关。使用反凝固策略的人的心血管结果(指南针)试验表明,与单独的阿司匹林治疗相比,蓖麻毒素治疗的阳性结果与单独的外周动脉疾病或颈动脉疾病相比。我们试图估算澳大利亚医疗保健系统的角度的成本效益。方法和结果开发了马尔可夫模型,以模拟具有外周血动脉疾病或颈动脉疾病的1万个体的假设群体的经验,以罗西腊洛林治疗与阿司匹林疗法同时治疗。随着每年的年度周期,个体面临非致命心血管疾病事件,主要不良肢体事件或死亡的风险。个体也有非致命的重大出血的风险。该模型有一生的时间范围。费用和公用事业从文献中采购,每年折扣5.0%。 Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin治疗防止了143例非致命心血管疾病事件,118例主要不良肢体事件和10例死亡仅与阿司匹林治疗相比。相反,156份额外的主要非致命出血都有累积。在额外的256年享有256次获得的寿命,额外费用为6,858,103美元,增量成本效益率为每年享有26,769美元(折扣),每个质量调整的终身年度都在澳大利亚的任意愿意支付澳元的任意愿意$ 50,000。结论在具有外周血动脉疾病或颈动脉疾病的人中,Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin治疗对于单独的阿司匹林治疗相比,在预防复发性心血管疾病方面是有效的和成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号