首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Procedure-specific Risks of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Urological Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Procedure-specific Risks of Thrombosis and Bleeding in Urological Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:泌尿外癌手术中血栓形成和出血的过程特异性风险:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Context Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis involves balancing a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) against a higher risk of bleeding, a trade-off that critically depends on the risks of VTE and bleeding in the absence of prophylaxis (baseline risk). Objective To provide estimates of the baseline risk of symptomatic VTE and bleeding requiring reoperation in urological cancer surgery. Evidence acquisition We identified contemporary observational studies reporting symptomatic VTE or bleeding after urological procedures. We used studies with the lowest risk of bias and accounted for use of thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up to derive best estimates of the baseline risks within 4 wk of surgery. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. Evidence synthesis We included 71 studies reporting on 14 urological cancer procedures. The quality of the evidence was generally moderate for prostatectomy and cystectomy, and low or very low for other procedures. The duration of thromboprophylaxis was highly variable. The risk of VTE in cystectomies was high (2.6–11.6% across risk groups) whereas the risk of bleeding was low (0.3%). The risk of VTE in prostatectomies varied by procedure, from 0.2–0.9% in robotic prostatectomy without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) to 3.9–15.7% in open prostatectomy with extended PLND. The risk of bleeding was 0.1–1.0%. The risk of VTE following renal procedures was 0.7–2.9% for low-risk patients and 2.6–11.6% for high-risk patients; the risk of bleeding was 0.1–2.0%. Conclusions Extended thromboprophylaxis is warranted in some procedures (eg, open and robotic cystectomy) but not others (eg, robotic prostatectomy without PLND in low-risk patients). For “close call” procedures, decisions will depend on values and preferences with regard to VTE and bleeding. Patient summary Clinicians often give blood thinners to patients to prevent blood clots after surgery for urological cancer. Unfortunately, blood thinners also increase bleeding. This study provides information on the risk of clots and bleeding that is crucial in deciding for or against giving blood thinners. Take Home Message Clinicians often give blood thinners to patients to prevent blood clots after urological cancer surgery. Unfortunately, blood thinners also increase bleeding. This study provides information about the risk of clots and bleeding, which is crucial when deciding for or against giving blood thinners.
机译:摘要上下文药理学血浆丙基丙基脲涉及平衡静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险较高的出血风险,批判性地取决于VTE和在没有预防的情况下出血(基线风险)的风险。目的探讨症状VTE的基线风险和需要重新进食泌尿外癌手术的脑卒中。证据收购我们确定了当代观测研究报告泌尿外情程序后症状VTE或出血。我们使用具有最低偏倚风险的研究,并占用血栓造黄精和后续行动的长度,以导出4周内的基线风险的最佳估计。我们利用年级方法来评估证据的质量。证据合成我们包括71项研究报告了14项泌尿癌手术。证据的质量通常适中用于前列腺切除术和膀胱切除术,以及其他程序的低或非常低。血浆丙基抑制的持续时间是高度可变的。膀胱切除术中VTE的风险高(风险群体跨越2.6-11.6%),而出血的风险低(0.3%)。 vte在前列腺切除术中的风险在程序中变化,从脑前列腺切除术中的0.2-0.9%,延长PLND的开放前列腺切除术中没有盆腔淋巴结分布(PLND)。出血的风险为0.1-1.0%。低风险患者的肾脏程序后VTE的风险为0.7-2.9%,高风险患者2.6-11.6%;出血的风险为0.1-2.0%。结论在某些程序(例如,开放和机器人膀胱切除术)中不需要扩展的血栓性血栓抑制,而不是其他程序(例如,在低风险患者中没有PLND的机器人前列腺切除术)。对于“关闭呼叫”程序,决策将取决于VTE和出血的值和偏好。患者总结临床医生通常会给患者稀释患者,以防止手术后血栓泌尿癌。不幸的是,血液稀释剂也会增加出血。本研究提供了关于凝块和出血风险的信息,这在决定或反对给予血液稀释剂时至关重要。带回家的信息临床医生经常将血液稀释给患者,以防止泌尿科癌症手术后血栓。不幸的是,血液稀释剂也会增加出血。本研究提供有关凝块和出血风险的信息,这在决定或反对稀释剂时至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号