...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of wildlife research >Impact of different panels of microsatellite loci, different numbers of loci, sample sizes, and gender ratios on population genetic results in red deer
【24h】

Impact of different panels of microsatellite loci, different numbers of loci, sample sizes, and gender ratios on population genetic results in red deer

机译:不同面板的微卫星基因座,不同数量的基因座,样本尺寸和性别比对红鹿群体遗传结果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Population genetic parameters from different studies might be significantly influenced by differences in sample size, fraction of males and females, marker number, and sets of markers used, reducing the comparability between studies. This hypothesis was tested on a red deer population of 205 individuals with an estimated size of 1000 animals. Four tests were performed: (1) the population was subdivided into 10 populations each with 10 to 150 individuals and genotyped with 16 markers, (2) the total population was genotyped 10 times with different panels of microsatellite loci containing 2 to 14 markers, (3) a subset of 8 microsatellite loci was used to genotype the total population; markers of this subset were replaced one by one with a different marker set and genotyping results were compared to the results of the original subset and (4) the effect of sex was estimated. Additionally, 24 references from literature, including 256 European red deer populations, were analyzed. A median of 25 individuals per population was investigated in published studies using 11 microsatellite markers (5 to 22). Sixty-eight percent of possible study comparisons matched with less than 10% of microsatellite loci. Our results show that the factors investigated, except for the factor gender, lead to significant deviations in the population genetic results, especially with sample sizes below 30, with less than 6 to 8 microsatellite markers and with the use of different panels of microsatellite loci. This is also true with respect to population genetic structure and the use of Bayesian methods. Therefore, populations from different studies should be compared with each other with caution.
机译:来自不同研究的人口遗传参数可能会受到使用样本大小,男性分数和雌性的差异,标记数和所用的标记组的显着影响,降低了研究之间的可比性。该假设在205个个体的红鹿群上进行了测试,估计尺寸为1000只动物。进行了四次测试:(1)将群体细分为10个群体,每种群体均有10至150个个体,并进行16种标记的基因分型,(2)总群体与含有2-14个标记的微卫星基因座的不同面板进行了10次,( 3)8个微卫星基因座的子集用于基因型总人群;将该子集的标记逐一取代,用不同的标记集,并将基因分型结果与原始子集的结果进行比较,(4)估计性别的效果。此外,分析了来自文献的24个参考文献,包括256个欧洲红鹿群。在出版的研究中使用11种微卫星标记(5至22)进行了每群人的25个中位数。六十八个可能的研究比较符合小于10%的微卫星基因座。我们的研究结果表明,除了因素性别外,研究的因素导致人口遗传结果中的显着偏差,特别是在30以下的样本尺寸,小于6至8微卫星标记,并使用微卫星基因座的不同面板。对于人口遗传结构和贝叶斯方法的使用,这也是如此。因此,应谨慎地将来自不同研究的人群相互比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号