...
首页> 外文期刊>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience >Antipsychotic drugs for patients with schizophrenia and predominant or prominent negative symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Antipsychotic drugs for patients with schizophrenia and predominant or prominent negative symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:精神分裂症患者的抗精神病药物和主要的阴性症状:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Negative symptoms are the core of schizophrenia, but whether antipsychotics are efficacious for their treatment is unclear. Moreover, there is debate whether patients in relevant trials should have predominant negative symptoms or whether prominent negative symptoms are also acceptable. Methods We systematically reviewed randomised, blinded antipsychotic drug trials in patients with schizophrenia and either predominant or prominent negative symptoms (last search Dec 12, 2017). Separate pairwise meta-analyses were conducted in these two populations. The primary outcome was negative symptoms. Depressive, symptoms, positive symptoms, and extrapyramidal side-effects were analysed as causes of secondary negative symptoms. Findings We included 21 randomized-controlled trials with 3451 participants which revealed the following significant differences in the primary outcome: in patients with predominant negative symptoms amisulpride was superior to placebo ( N ?=?4; n ?=?590, SMD 0.47, CI 0.23, 0.71), olanzapine was superior to haloperidol in a small trial ( n ?=?35) and cariprazine outperformed risperidone ( N ?=?1, n ?=?456, SMD ??0.29, CI ??0.48, ??0.11). In patients with prominent negative symptoms, olanzapine and quetiapine were superior to risperidone in single trials. Overall, studies in prominent negative symptoms were potentially more confounded by improvements of secondary negative symptoms. Interpretation Amisulpride is the only antipsychotic that outperformed placebo in the treatment of predominant negative symptoms, but there was a parallel reduction of depression. Cariprazine was better than risperidone in a large trial that was well-controlled for secondary negative symptoms, but the trial was sponsored by its manufacturer. Future trials should apply scientifically developed definitions such as the deficit syndrome and the persistent negative symptoms concept.
机译:背景背部阴性症状是精神分裂症的核心,但抗精神病药是否对其治疗有效尚不清楚。此外,有关相关试验中的患者是否应该具有卓越的阴性症状或者是否突出的阴性症状也是可以接受的。方法我们系统地审查了精神分裂症患者的随机,盲目的抗精神病药试验,占主导地位或突出的阴性症状(最后搜索2017年12月12日)。在这两种群体中进行了分离的成对元分析。主要结果是阴性症状。分析了抑郁,症状,阳性症状和外锥形副作用作为次要阴性症状的原因。结果我们包括21个随机对照试验,其中3451名参与者,揭示了主要结果的以下显着差异:在患有主要阴性症状的患者中,氨基丙烯酯优于安慰剂(n?= 4; n?=?590,SMD 0.47,CI 0.23,0.71),奥氮滨优于氟哌啶醇,在小试验中(n?= 35)和甲尿嘧啶优于血红腺素(n?=?1,n?= 456,SMD ?? 0.29,CI ?? 0.48,?? 0.11)。在突出阴性症状的患者中,单一试验中的奥兰扎和喹啉和喹啉术中均优于Risperidone。总体而言,突出的消极症状的研究可能会因改善次要消极症状而更加混乱。解释氨基丙烯酸盐是唯一抗精神病药,在治疗主要的阴性症状时表现出优势,但抑郁症的平行降低。在大型试验中,甲尿嘧啶比立体酮更好,对次要负面症状良好控制,但审判由其制造商赞助。未来的试验应基于科学发展的定义,如缺陷综合征和持续的消极症状概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号