首页> 外文期刊>European journal of human genetics: EJHG >The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks
【24h】

The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks

机译:GDPR和研究豁免:关于研究生物人物必要保障的考虑因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force in May 2018. The aspiration of providing for a high level of protection to individuals' personal data risked placing considerable constraints on scientific research, which was contrary to various research traditions across the EU. Therefore, along with the set of carefully outlined data subjects' rights, the GDPR provides for a two-level framework to enable derogations from these rights when scientific research is concerned. First, by directly invoking provisions of the GDPR on a condition that safeguards that must include 'technical and organisational measures' are in place and second, through the Member State law. Although these derogations are allowed in the name of scientific research, they can simultaneously be challenging in light of the ethical requirements and well-established standards in biobanking that have been set forth in various research-related soft legal tools, international treaties and other legal instruments. In this article, we review such soft legal tools, international treaties and other legal instruments that regulate the use of health research data. We report on the results of this review, and analyse the rights contained within the GDPR and Article 89 of the GDPR vis-a-vis these instruments. These instruments were also reviewed to provide guidance on possible safeguards that should be followed when implementing any derogations. To conclude, we will offer some commentary on limits of the derogations under the GDPR and appropriate safeguards to ensure compliance with standard ethical requirements.
机译:2018年5月,一般数据保护条例(GDPR)生效。为个人个人数据提供高度保护的愿望冒着对科研的相当约束,这与欧盟各地的各种研究传统相反。因此,随着仔细概述的数据受试者的权利,GDPR提供了一个双层框架,以便在科学研究所关注的情况下启用来自这些权利的损失。首先,通过直接调用GDPR的条件,该条件是通过成员国法律和第二项必须包括“技术和组织措施”的保障措施。虽然这些贬损是以科学研究的名义允许的,但在各种研究相关的软合法工具,国际条约和其他法律文书中,它们可以同时挑战。 。在本文中,我们审查了规范卫生研究数据使用的软法律工具,国际条约和其他法律文书。我们报告了本综述结果,并分析了GDPR和GPR诉讼中的第89条中所载的权利。还审查了这些文书,为实施任何减损时应遵循的可能保障措施提供指导。要结束,我们将对GDPR下的贬损的限制提供一些评论,以及适当的保障措施,以确保遵守标准道德要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号