首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Journal of Human Genetics >The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks
【2h】

The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks

机译:GDPR和研究豁免:关于研究生物库必要保障的考虑

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force in May 2018. The aspiration of providing for a high level of protection to individuals’ personal data risked placing considerable constraints on scientific research, which was contrary to various research traditions across the EU. Therefore, along with the set of carefully outlined data subjects’ rights, the GDPR provides for a two-level framework to enable derogations from these rights when scientific research is concerned. First, by directly invoking provisions of the GDPR on a condition that safeguards that must include ‘technical and organisational measures’ are in place and second, through the Member State law. Although these derogations are allowed in the name of scientific research, they can simultaneously be challenging in light of the ethical requirements and well-established standards in biobanking that have been set forth in various research-related soft legal tools, international treaties and other legal instruments. In this article, we review such soft legal tools, international treaties and other legal instruments that regulate the use of health research data. We report on the results of this review, and analyse the rights contained within the GDPR and Article 89 of the GDPR vis-à-vis these instruments. These instruments were also reviewed to provide guidance on possible safeguards that should be followed when implementing any derogations. To conclude, we will offer some commentary on limits of the derogations under the GDPR and appropriate safeguards to ensure compliance with standard ethical requirements.
机译:通用数据保护条例(GDPR)于2018年5月生效。为个人个人数据提供高水平保护的愿望有可能对科学研究造成很大的限制,这与欧盟的各种研究传统背道而驰。因此,除了一整套经过精心概述的数据主体的权利外,GDPR还提供了一个两级框架,可以在涉及科学研究时使这些权利受到克减。首先,在条件必须到位且必须包括“技术和组织措施”的条件下,直接援引GDPR的规定;其次,通过成员国法律。尽管以科学研究的名义允许这些减损,但是鉴于各种研究相关的软法律工具,国际条约和其他法律文书中规定的道德要求和生物银行业已确立的标准,它们同时具有挑战性。在本文中,我们将对此类软法律工具,国际条约和其他规范卫生研究数据使用的法律工具进行回顾。我们报告了此次审查的结果,并针对这些工具分析了GDPR和GDPR第89条所包含的权利。还对这些文书进行了审查,以就实施克减规定应遵循的可能保障措施提供指导。最后,我们将对GDPR规定的克减限制和适当的保障措施提供一些评论,以确保符合标准的道德要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号