...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of heart failure: journal of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology >Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease: analysis of survival according to the haemodynamic classification of the 2015 ESC ESC / ERS ERS guidelines and insights for future changes
【24h】

Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease: analysis of survival according to the haemodynamic classification of the 2015 ESC ESC / ERS ERS guidelines and insights for future changes

机译:由于左心疾病导致的肺动脉高压:根据2015年ESC ESC / ERS的血流动力学分类,对未来变化的准则和见解的血流动力学分类分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Aims Pulmonary hypertension ( PH ) is a relevant complication of left heart disease ( LHD ). The 2015 ESC / ERS PH guidelines report two different haemodynamic subsets of PH due to LHD (PH‐LHD) based on levels of pulmonary vascular resistance ( PVR ) and diastolic pressure gradient ( DPG ): isolated post‐capillary PH (Ipc‐ PH ) and combined post‐ and pre‐capillary PH (Cpc‐ PH ). The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of Ipc‐ PH and Cpc‐ PH . Methods and results Data from 276 consecutive incident patients with PH‐LHD were included. According to the guidelines, Ipc‐ PH is defined by DPG 7 mmHg and/or PVR ≤3 Wood units ( WU ) and Cpc‐ PH by DPG ≥7 mmHg and/or PVR 3 WU . Using this definition, we identified three patient groups: Ipc‐ PH with both normal PVR and DPG (108 patients); Cpc‐ PH with both increased PVR and DPG (66 patients); and an intermediate group with either increased PVR or DPG (102 patients). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between groups using the log‐rank test. Patients with Ipc‐ PH had better survival compared with the group of patients with Cpc‐ PH ( P = 0.026) and the intermediate group ( P = 0.025). No survival difference was detected between patients with Cpc‐ PH and the intermediate group ( P = 0.891). Patients with normal PVR had a better survival compared with those with elevated PVR ( P = 0.012); while no difference was observed according to the level of DPG ( P = 0.253). Conclusion Patients with Ipc‐ PH have a better prognosis compared with patients with Cpc‐ PH and with patients with isolated increase of PVR or DPG . Pulmonary vascular resistance has a better predictive value than DPG in patients with PH‐LHD .
机译:摘要旨在肺动脉高压(pH)是左心疾病(LHD)的相关并发症。 2015年ESC / ERS ​​pH指南由于LHD(pH-LHD)报告了两种不同的血液动力学亚群,基于LHD(pH-LHD)基于肺血管阻力(PVR)和舒张压梯度(DPG):毛细血管后pH(IPC-pH)分离并结合后和毛细管前pH(CPC- pH)。本研究的目的是评估IPC-pH和CPC-pH的预后价值。包括276名连续事件患者的方法和结果包括PH-LHD的患者。根据指导原则,IPC-pH由DPG 7和/或PVR≤3木单位(WU)和CPC-pH由DPG≥7mmHg和/或PVR& 3 Wu定义。使用本定义,我们确定了三个患者组:具有正常PVR和DPG(108名患者)的IPC-pH; CPC-pH增加PVR和DPG(66名患者);和具有增加的PVR或DPG(102名患者)的中间组。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存,并使用日志秩检验比较组之间的比较。与CPC-pH(P = 0.026)和中间组(P = 0.025)相比,患有IPC-pH的患者具有更好的存活率(P = 0.025)。 CPC-pH和中间组之间没有检测到存活差异(p = 0.891)。患有正常PVR的患者与PVR升高的人相比具有更好的存活(P = 0.012);虽然根据DPG的水平没有观察到差异(P = 0.253)。结论IPC-pH的患者与CPC-pH患者和分离的PVR或DPG患者相比具有更好的预后。肺血管抗性比PH-LHD患者的DPG具有更好的预测值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号