...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Haematology >Effect of deferasirox + erythropoietin vs erythropoietin on erythroid response in Low/Int‐1‐risk MDS MDS patients: Results of the phase II KALLISTO II KALLISTO trial
【24h】

Effect of deferasirox + erythropoietin vs erythropoietin on erythroid response in Low/Int‐1‐risk MDS MDS patients: Results of the phase II KALLISTO II KALLISTO trial

机译:脱司叶蛋白+促红细胞生成素对低/ int-1风险MDS MDS患者红细胞反应的影响:II kallisto II Kallisto试验的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Objectives Erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents ( ESA s) remain first‐choice to treat symptomatic anemia and delay transfusion dependence in most patients with lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes ( MDS ) without del(5q). Deferasirox increased erythroid responses in some lower‐risk MDS patients in clinical trials, and adding low‐dose deferasirox to ESA treatment may further improve erythroid response. Methods KALLISTO ( NCT01868477 ) was a randomized, open‐label, multicenter, phase II study. Lower‐risk MDS patients received deferasirox at 10?mg/kg/d (dispersible tablets) or 7?mg/kg/d (film‐coated tablets) plus erythropoietin (n?=?11), or erythropoietin alone (n?=?12) for 24?weeks. The primary endpoint was the between‐group difference in erythroid response within 12?weeks. Results Erythroid response occurred in 27.3% of patients receiving deferasirox plus erythropoietin vs 41.7% of patients receiving erythropoietin alone within 12?weeks (difference 14.4%; 95% CI ?24.0, 48.16). Within 24?weeks, the hematologic response rate was 27.3% with deferasirox plus erythropoietin vs 50% with erythropoietin alone, and hematologic improvement rates were 45.5% vs 100%. Deferasirox plus erythropoietin was generally well tolerated. Conclusions In this small pilot study, combining low‐dose deferasirox with erythropoietin did not improve erythroid response. It remains of interest to investigate early chelation approaches with even lower deferasirox doses plus erythropoietin in lower‐risk MDS patients before the onset of transfusion dependence.
机译:摘要目的,促红细胞刺激剂(ESA S)仍然是治疗症状性贫血和延迟输血依赖性的首选,在没有DEL(5Q)的患者中患有较低风险的骨髓增生综合征(MDS)的患者。 Deferasirox在一些临床试验中增加了一些低风险的MDS患者的红细胞反应,并将低剂量脱铁司添加到ESA治疗中可能进一步改善红细胞反应。方法Kallisto(NCT01868477)是随机的开放标签,多中心,II期研究。低风险的MDS患者在10?Mg / kg / d(可分散片)或7×mg / kg / d(膜涂覆片)的脱硫血症加上促红细胞生成素(n?='11),或单独促红细胞生成素(n?= ?12)24个?周。主要终点是12月内红细胞响应的组差异之间的组差异。结果27.3%的患者接受脱硫血管蛋白的患者发生红细胞反应促使促红细胞生成素患者在12?周内仅接受促红细胞生成素的患者(差异14.4%; 95%CI?24.0,48.16)。在24周内,血液学反应率为27.3%,脱气血管加红细胞生成素与单独的促红细胞生成素,血液学改善率为45.5%vs 100%。 Deferasirox加红细胞生成素通常是良好的耐受性。结论在这项小型试点研究中,将低剂量脱硫与促红细胞生成素组合并未改善红细胞反应。在输血依赖性发生前,甚至在低危MDS患者中,甚至降低脱磷酸剂量加红细胞生成素,甚至降低脱硫剂量加红细胞生成素仍然有兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号