Comparison of transplant‐specific prognostic scoring systems in haploidentical transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome

摘要

Abstract Objectives We intended to identify the predictive abilities of recently published transplant‐specific prognostic scoring systems in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome ( MDS ) receiving haploidentical transplantation. Methods The outcomes of 73 patients with MDS receiving haploidentical transplantation were analyzed, according to the MTPSS , the TRI , and the CIBMTR scoring systems. Results The median age of patients at transplantation was 50 (range, 19‐69) years. The IPSS ‐R cytogenetic risks of very good/good, intermediate, and poor/very poor were, respectively, observed in 35 (48.0%), 25 (34.2%), and 13 (17.8%) patients, including 4 (5.5%) with a monosomal karyotype. Pretransplant treatment failure and high (≥3) HCT ‐ CI were observed in 30 (41.1%) and 35 (48.0%) patients, respectively. With survivor’s median follow‐up of 42.3?months, the overall survival rate at 4?years of all patients was 65.5% (95% CI , 52.4‐75.9). The MTPSS (100%, 77.3%, 62.5%, and 42.0% at 4?years; P? = ? .02) and the TRI (100%, 79.9%, 76.0%, and 17.1% at 4?years; P? ? .01) differentiate proportionally overall survival rates according to their 4 risk groups, whereas the CIBMTR scoring system did not ( P? = ? .17). Conclusions Our results suggest the potential ability of the MPTSS and the TRI as prognostic tools for patients with MDS receiving haploidentical transplantation.