首页> 外文期刊>European journal of gastroenterology and hepatology >Usefulness of the Glasgow-Blatchford score to predict 1-week mortality in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding
【24h】

Usefulness of the Glasgow-Blatchford score to predict 1-week mortality in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding

机译:Glasgow-Blatchford评分的有用性,以预测食管静脉曲张出血患者的1周死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectivesEsophageal variceal bleeding is one of the most severe complications of liver cirrhosis, with high mortality. However, there is no established scoring system for short-term mortality in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and the Child-Pugh score for predicting short-term and hospital mortality in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding.MethodsA total of 47 patients with esophageal variceal bleeding were studied between September 2009 and March 2015. The GBS, the MELD score, and the Child-Pugh score were assessed for their ability to predict 1- and 6-week mortality rates using a receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsThe 1- and 6-week mortality rates were 17.0 and 31.9%, respectively. The median GBS, MELD, and Child-Pugh scores were 13 (range: 4-19), 10 (range: 0-34), and 9 (range: 5-13), respectively. The GBS was superior to both the MELD and the Child-Pugh scores for prediction of 1-week mortality [area under the curve=0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.98) vs. 0.71 (0.47-0.96) and 0.72 (0.53-0.91)]. The MELD score was superior to both the Child-Pugh score and the GBS for prediction of 6-week mortality [area under the curve=0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.97) vs. 0.69 (0.52-0.85) and 0.67 (0.50-0.83)].ConclusionFor 1-week mortality, the GBS was superior to the Child-Pugh and the MELD scores in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding. However, for 6-week mortality, the MELD score was superior in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:ObjectiveSoOphageal Variceal Blleeding是肝硬化最严重的并发症之一,具有高死亡率。然而,对食管静脉血出血患者的短期死亡率没有建立的评分系统。本研究的目的是评估Glasgow-Blatchford评分(GBS)的有用性,该评分(MELD)得分(MELD)评分的模型,以及用于预测患者患者短期和医院死亡率的儿童-PUGH得分食管静脉曲张出血。2009年9月和2015年3月在2009年9月之间研究了47例食管静脉曲张出血的47名患者。汇集了GBS,MELD评分和儿童-PUGH得分为他们预测1-周和6周死亡率的能力使用接收器操作特征曲线。1-和6周死亡率分别为17.0%和31.9%。中位数GBS,MELD和COLD-PUGH分数分别为13(范围:4-19),10(范围:0-34)和9(范围:5-13)。 GBS优于MELD和CHIRD-PUGH评分,用于预测1周死亡率[曲线下面积= 0.82(95%置信区间:0.66-0.98)与0.71(0.47-0.96)和0.72(0.53 -0.91)]。该分数优于儿童-PUGH得分和GBS,用于预测6周死亡率[曲线下面积= 0.83(95%置信区间:0.69-0.97)与0.69(0.52-0.85)和0.67( 0.50-0.83)。结论结论为1周死亡率,GBS优于儿童-PUGH和食管静脉曲张出血患者的融合成绩。然而,对于6周的死亡率,MELD评分在食管静脉曲张出血的患者中优越。版权所有(C)2017 Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号