首页> 外文期刊>European journal of cancer care >A systematic review of the methods utilised to measure the relationship between cancer patients and oncologists: Implications for future research and practice
【24h】

A systematic review of the methods utilised to measure the relationship between cancer patients and oncologists: Implications for future research and practice

机译:系统审查用于衡量癌症患者和肿瘤科学家之间关系的方法:对未来的研究和实践的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Introduction The patient–physician relationship is a critical component of patient‐centred health care. The patient–oncologist relationship is particularly important due to the uncertainties that surround treatment of cancer. The goal of the current review was to summarise current methodological approaches to studying the relationship between cancer patients and oncologists. Methods A systematic review using PsychInfo, Ebsco, PubMed and Google Scholar was performed using combinations and variations of the MESH terms: “relationship,” “doctor‐patient,” and “oncology.” The included studies explicitly measured the “relationship” as an independent or dependent variable. Data were extracted and analysed. Results The 13 studies included in the review were published from 2004 to 2018. There was little agreement between studies on the definition of the patient–oncologist relationship. Trust was most frequently measured, but methods varied. Most studies evaluated the patient perspective ( n ?=?10). The few studies that considered the oncologist perspective did not measure their perception of the relationship. Conclusions The current review demonstrates that current approaches used to assess the patient–oncologist relationship are inconsistent. These differences may limit our understanding of patient needs in current research and practice. Future research should focus on the use of a relational lens as a theoretical framework to assess the patient–oncologist relationship.
机译:摘要引言患者 - 医师关系是患者以患者为中心的医疗保健的关键组成部分。由于围绕癌症治疗的不确定性,患者肿瘤科学家的关系尤为重要。目前审查的目标是总结当前的方法论方法,以研究癌症患者和肿瘤学家之间的关系。方法使用Mesh术语的组合和变体进行SysteCINFO,EBSCO,PubMed和Google学者进行系统审查:“关系”,“医生”和“肿瘤学”。附录的研究明确地测量了“关系”作为独立或依赖变量。提取数据并分析。结果审查中包含的13项研究于2004年至2018年出版。关于患者肿瘤学家关系的定义之间的研究几乎没有一致。信任最常被测量,但方法变化。大多数研究评估了患者的透视图(n?=?10)。认为肿瘤科医师观点的少数研究没有衡量他们对关系的看法。结论目前的审查表明,用于评估患者肿瘤科学家关系的目前的方法是不一致的。这些差异可能会限制我们对当前研究和实践中对患者需求的理解。未来的研究应该专注于使用关系镜头作为评估患者肿瘤科学家关系的理论框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号