首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture and two CE-IVDmarked quantitative real-time PCRs with microbiota analysis for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
【24h】

Comparison of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture and two CE-IVDmarked quantitative real-time PCRs with microbiota analysis for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis

机译:AMSEL标准,苦难评分,培养和两种CE-IVDMarked定量实时PCR与微生物阴道病诊断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common gynaecological condition. Diagnosis of BV is typically based on Amsel criteria, Nugent score and/or bacterial culture. In this study, these conventional methods and two CE-IVD marked quantitative real-time (q)PCR assays were compared with microbiota analysis for the diagnosis of BV. Eighty women were evaluated for BV during two sequential hospital visits by Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture, the AmpliSens (R) Florocenosis/Bacterial vaginosis-FRT PCR kit (InterLabService, Moscow, Russia), and the BD MAX (TM) Vaginal Panel (BD Diagnostics, MD, USA). Microbiota analysis based on amplicon sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was used as reference test. The microbiota profile of 36/115 (31%) included cases was associated with BV. Based on microbiota analysis, the sensitivity of detecting BV was 38.9% for culture, 61.15% for Amsel criteria, 63.9% for Nugent score and the BD MAX assay, and 80.6% for the AmpliSens assay, while the specificity of all methods was >= 92.4%. Microbiota profiles of the cases with discrepant results between microbiota analysis and the diagnostic methods were variable. All five diagnostic methods missed BV positive cases with a relatively high abundance of the genus Alloscardovia, Bifidobacterium, or Dialister, which were categorised as unspecified dysbiosis by the AmpliSens assay. Compared to Amsel criteria, Nugent score, culture, and the BD MAX assay, the AmpliSens assay was most in agreement with microbiota analysis, indicating that currently, the AmpliSens assay may be the best diagnostic method available to diagnose BV in a routine clinical setting.
机译:细菌性阴道病(BV)是一种常见的妇科病症。 BV的诊断通常基于AMSEL标准,抗病率和/或细菌培养。在该研究中,将这些常规方法和两个CE-IVD标记为定量实时(Q)PCR测定与微生物群分析进行比较,用于诊断BV。通过AMSEL标准,苦难评分,培养,植物植物病毒/细菌性阴茎病(InterlaService,Moscow,Russia)和BD Max(TM)阴道板(Interlabsservice,俄罗斯)和BD Max(TM)阴道阴影面板(Anterlabservice (BD诊断,MD,美国)。基于16S核糖体RNA基因的扩增子测序的微生物群分析用作参考试验。 36/115(31%)的微生物菌曲线含量与BV有关。基于微生物群分析,培养的检测BV的敏感性为38.9%,适用于AMSEL标准的61.15%,抗菌评分的63.9%,并且BD MAX测定和80.6%的放大测定,而所有方法的特异性> = 92.4%。微生物群案例的案例差异导致微生物群分析和诊断方法是可变的。所有五种诊断方法都错过了BV阳性病例,具有相对高的Alloscardovia,双歧杆菌或拨号,其被扩增测定分类为未指明的脱敏。与AMSEL标准相比,顽皮的评分,培养和BD MAX测定,扩增率测定大多是与微生物群分析一致的,表明目前,扩增分析可能是诊断常规临床环境中BV的最佳诊断方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号