首页> 外文期刊>European journal of applied physiology >The corticospinal responses of metronome-paced, but not self-paced strength training are similar to motor skill training
【24h】

The corticospinal responses of metronome-paced, but not self-paced strength training are similar to motor skill training

机译:节奏节奏的皮质脊髓反应,但不是自花奏的力量培训类似于运动技能培训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Purpose The corticospinal responses to skill training may be different to strength training, depending on how the strength training is performed. It was hypothesised that the corticospinal responses would not be different following skill training and metronome-paced strength training (MPST), but would differ when compared with self-paced strength training (SPST). Methods Corticospinal excitability, short-interval intra-cortical inhibition (SICI) and strength and tracking error were measured at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks. Participants ( n ?=?44) were randomly allocated to visuomotor tracking, MPST, SPST or a control group. Results MPST increased strength by 7 and 18%, whilst SPST increased strength by 12 and 26% following 2 and 4 weeks of strength training. There were no changes in strength following skill training. Skill training reduced tracking error by 47 and 58% at 2 and 4 weeks. There were no changes in tracking error following SPST; however, tracking error reduced by 24% following 4 weeks of MPST. Corticospinal excitability increased by 40% following MPST and by 29% following skill training. There was no change in corticospinal excitability following 4 weeks of SPST. Importantly, the magnitude of change between skill training and MPST was not different. SICI decreased by 41 and 61% following 2 and 4 weeks of MPST, whilst SICI decreased by 41 and 33% following 2 and 4 weeks of skill training. Again, SPST had no effect on SICI at 2 and 4 weeks. There was no difference in the magnitude of SICI reduction between skill training and MPST. Conclusions This study adds new knowledge regarding the corticospinal responses to skill and MPST, showing they are similar but different when compared with SPST.
机译:摘要目的对技能训练的皮质响应可能与力量训练不同,具体取决于执行强度训练。假设技能训练和节奏的力量训练(MPST)后的皮质脊髓反应不会不同,但与自节尾强度训练(SPST)相比会有所不同。方法在基线和2周和4周测量皮质脊髓兴奋性,短期内 - 皮质抑制(SICI)和强度和跟踪误差。将参与者(n?=α44)随机分配给游瓜素物质跟踪,MPST,SPST或对照组。结果MPST强度提高7%,虽然SPST的强度培训后,SPST的强度增加12%和26%。技能培训后没有改变力量。技能训练在2和4周内减少47和58%的跟踪误差。在SPST后跟踪错误没有变化;然而,在MPST 4周后,跟踪误差减少了24%。在MPST后,Porticostophinal兴奋性在技能训练后增加了40%。 SPST 4周后皮质术兴奋性没有变化。重要的是,技能训练与MPST之间的变化的大小没有不同。在MPST的2和4周后,SICI减少了41%和61%,而SICI在技能训练的2和4周后减少41%和33%。同样,SPST在2周和4周内对SICI没有影响。技能训练与MPST之间的SICI幅度没有差异。结论本研究为对技能和MPST的皮质脊髓反应增添了新的知识,显示它们与SPST相比的相似但不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号