首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Using survey questions to measure preferences: Lessons from an experimental validation in Kenya
【24h】

Using survey questions to measure preferences: Lessons from an experimental validation in Kenya

机译:使用调查问题来衡量偏好:肯尼亚实验验证的课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Can a short survey instrument reliably measure a range of fundamental economic preferences across diverse settings? We focus on survey questions that systematically predict behavior in incentivized experimental tasks among German university students (Becker et al. 2016) and were implemented among representative samples across the globe (Falk et al. 2018). This paper presents results of an experimental validation conducted among low-income individuals in Nairobi, Kenya. We find that quantitative survey measures - hypothetical versions of experimental tasks - of time preference, attitude to risk and altruism are good predictors of choices in incentivized experiments, suggesting these measures are broadly experimentally valid. At the same time, we find that qualitative questions - self-assessments - do not correlate with the experimental measures of preferences in the Kenyan sample. Thus, caution is needed before treating self-assessments as proxies of preferences in new contexts. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:简短的调查仪器可以可靠地测量各种环境的一系列基本的经济偏好吗?我们专注于调查问题,系统地预测德国大学生激励实验任务中的行为(Becker等,2016),并在全球的代表性样本中实施(Falk等,2018)。本文介绍了肯尼亚内罗毕的低收入人物进行了实验验证的结果。我们发现定量调查措施 - 实验任务的假设版本 - 风险和利他主义的态度是激励实验中的选择的良好预测因素,这表明这些措施是广泛的实验有效的。与此同时,我们发现定性问题 - 自我评估 - 与肯尼亚样本中的偏好实验措施无关。因此,在将自我评估视为新背景中的偏好代理之前,需要小心。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号