...
首页> 外文期刊>Gerodontology >Patients' self-reported measures of oral health-A validation study on basis of oral health questions used in a large multi-country survey for populations aged 50+
【24h】

Patients' self-reported measures of oral health-A validation study on basis of oral health questions used in a large multi-country survey for populations aged 50+

机译:患者自我报告的口腔健康措施 - 对50岁人口大型多国调查中的口腔健康问题的验证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To assess the validity of patient self-reported oral health measures as used in a large multi-country survey for populations aged 50+. Background Information on people's oral health status is important for assessing oral health needs within populations. However, clinical examination is not always possible. Patient self-reported measures may provide an alternative when time and other resources are scarce. Materials and methods Using oral health items from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), self-reported measures were collected from 186 patients receiving treatment at Heidelberg University Hospital. Self-reports were compared with subsequent clinical examinations. Analyses were conducted for patients of all age groups and separately for patients aged 50+ (analogous to the SHARE study population). Diagnostic accuracy, agreement and correlation of patient-reported information were examined using descriptive statistics and Bland-Altman plots. Results Patient-reported presence or absence of a full tooth count was closely related to clinical measurement, both for all age groups (sensitivity: 93%; specificity: 92%) and persons aged 50+ (sensitivity: 100% specificity: 94%). Bland-Altman plots indicate good agreement between patient- and clinical reports of the number of teeth at age 50+ (Concordance Correlation Coefficient = 0.95). Discriminatory power of patient-reporting was good regarding presence vs absence of artificial teeth, but less robust regarding partial vs full replacement of missing teeth. Conclusion Patient self-evaluations provide reasonable estimates of clinical measures and appear sufficiently accurate for examining variations in the number of teeth, including among populations aged 50+. However, patient reports of the extent of replacement of missing teeth may not constitute reliable reflections of clinical conditions.
机译:目的探讨患者自我报告的口头健康措施的有效性,用于50岁以上的大型多国调查。关于人民口腔健康状况的背景信息对于评估人口中的口腔健康需求非常重要。但是,临床检查并不总是可能的。患者自我报告的措施可以在时间和其他资源稀缺时提供替代方案。从欧洲卫生,老龄化和退休调查中使用口头健康物品的材料和方法,从186名接受海德堡大学医院接受治疗的186名患者收集了自我报告的措施。将自我报告与后续临床检查进行比较。对所有年龄组的患者进行分析,分别为50岁以上的患者(类似于股票研究人群)。使用描述性统计和Bland-Altman图检查了患者报告信息的诊断准确性,协议和相关性。结果患者报告的存在或没有完整牙齿计数与所有年龄组(敏感性:93%;特异性:92%)和50岁以上的人(敏感性:100%特异性:94%)密切相关。 Bland-Altman Plots表示患者和临床报告之间的患者和临床报告之间的良好一致性,在50岁以上的牙齿数(一致性相关系数= 0.95)。患者报告的歧视性良好关于存在VS没有人造牙齿的存在,但对于部分与缺失的牙齿充分替换的局部Vs较低。结论患者自我评价提供了合理的临床措施估算,并且足以准确地检查牙齿数量的变化,包括50岁以上的人群。然而,患者报告缺失牙齿的替代程度可能不构成临床条件的可靠反映。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号