首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Independent vs. Coordinated Fundraising: Understanding the Role of Information
【24h】

Independent vs. Coordinated Fundraising: Understanding the Role of Information

机译:独立与协调筹款:了解信息的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We use "real donation" laboratory experiments to compare independent fundraising, where donation requests from different charities arrive sequentially to potential donors, with coordinated fundraising, where donation requests from different charities arrive simultaneously. We find that coordinated fundraising generates significantly larger total donations compared to independent fundraising. We show that the order of requests affects the level of donations only in independent fundraising; in particular, participants donate larger amounts to charities whose requests arrive earlier. We then test whether these differences might be explained by the informational asymmetry between these two fundraising mechanisms by varying the information received by the subjects. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们使用“实际捐赠”实验室实验来比较独立筹款,不同慈善机构的捐赠请求顺从到潜在捐助者,协调筹款,不同慈善机构的捐赠请求同时到达。 与独立筹款相比,我们发现协调筹款产生明显更大的总捐款。 我们表明,请求的顺序仅在独立筹款中影响捐款水平; 特别是,参与者向提前到达的慈善机构捐赠了更大的慈善机构。 然后,通过改变受试者收到的信息,测试这些差异是否可以通过这两个筹款机制之间的信息不对称解释。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号