...
首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsia: Journal of the International League against Epilepsy >Use of brivaracetam in genetic generalized epilepsies and for acute, intravenous treatment of absence status epilepticus
【24h】

Use of brivaracetam in genetic generalized epilepsies and for acute, intravenous treatment of absence status epilepticus

机译:使用Brivaracetam在遗传广义癫痫和急性,静脉内治疗缺失状态癫痫症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Summary Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness, retention, and tolerability of brivaracetam ( BRV ) in genetic generalized epilepsies ( GGE ) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients that started BRV in 2016 and 2017. Results A total of 61 patients (mean age = 29.8, range = 9‐90?years, 41 female [67%]) were treated with BRV . They were difficult to control, with 2.4 failed antiepileptic drugs ( AED s) in the past, taking 1.9 AED s on average at baseline. The length of exposure to BRV ranged from 7?days to 24?months, with a mean retention time of 7.9?months, resulting in a total exposure time to BRV of 483?months. The retention rate was 82% at 3?months and 69% at 6?months. Efficacy at 3?months was 36% (50% responder rate), with 25% seizure‐free for 3?months. Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy showed a responder rate of 60%, with 40% being free of any seizures. Long‐term 50% responder rate was present in 17 patients (28%; 11 seizure‐free [18%]) for 6?months and in 14 patients (23%; 10 seizure‐free [16%]) for 12?months. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were observed in 26% of the patients, with the most common being somnolence, ataxia, and psychobehavioral adverse events. Use of intravenous BRV with bolus injection of 200‐300?mg in two females with absence status epilepticus was well tolerated, but did not result in cessation of status epilepticus. Significance Use of BRV in GGE is well tolerated, and 50% responder rates are similar to those observed in the regulatory trials for focal epilepsies. An immediate switch from levetiracetam ( LEV ) to BRV at a ratio of 15:1 is feasible. The occurrence of psychobehavioral adverse events seems less prominent than under LEV , and a switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV ‐induced adverse events.
机译:发明内容本研究的目的是评估临床实践中Brivaracetam(BRV)在遗传广义癫痫(GGE)中的效果,保留和耐受性。方法方法招募招募2016年和2017年开始BRV的所有患者的招募。结果总共61名患者(平均年龄= 29.8,范围= 9-90岁,41雌性[67%])用BRV处理。他们难以控制,过去有2.4次失败的抗癫痫药物(AED S),平均每平均在基线上服用1.9 AED。暴露于BRV的长度范围为7天至24个月,平均保留时间为7.9?月,导致全曝光时间为483?月份。保留率为82%,在3个月,69%在6?月份。 3个月的疗效36%(响应率50%),3个月3个月癫痫发作25%。少年髓肺癫痫的患者表现出60%的响应率,40%没有任何癫痫发作。 17名患者中存在长期50%的响应率(28%; 11次癫痫发作[18%])& 6?月份和14个月,14个月(23%; 10次癫痫发作[16%])for&gt ;12个月。在26%的患者中观察到治疗紧急的不良事件,最常见的是嗜睡,共济失调和精神病症不良事件。使用静脉注射BOLUS注入200-300毫克的2毫克,其中两种雌性癫痫患者潜障碍良好,但未导致状态癫痫症。 BRV在GGE中的意义使用具有良好耐受性,并且50%的响应率类似于在局灶性癫痫的监管试验中观察到的率类似。从Levetiracetam(Lev)到BRV的直接切换为15:1的比例是可行的。精神病症不良事件的发生似乎不如Lem下的突出效果不那么突出,并且可以在患者患者中考虑到BRV的切换,患者受到不良事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号