首页> 外文期刊>Environmental health perspectives. >Epidemiology, public health, and false-positive results: the role of the clinicians and pathologists.
【24h】

Epidemiology, public health, and false-positive results: the role of the clinicians and pathologists.

机译:流行病学,公共卫生和假冒结果:临床医生和病理学家的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We congratulate Blair et al. (2009) and Boffetta et al. (2008) for drawing proper attention to the rhetoric of false-positive results concerning environmental determinants and human health outcomes.In particular, Boffetta et al. (2008) suggested that "users of epidemiological results outside the scientific community . . . should be aware of the fact that statistically significant or positive results are often false" and that "epidemiology is particularly prone to the generation of false-positive results."
机译:我们祝贺Blair等人。 (2009)和Boffetta等。 (2008年)为了提高关于环境决定因素和人类健康成果的假冒结果的言论。特别是Boffetta等。 (2008)建议,“科学界之外的流行病学结果的用户。。。。应该意识到统计上显着或阳性结果通常是假的”,“流行病学特别容易发生了伪阳性结果的产生。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号