...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >What is going wrong with community engagement? How flood communities and flood authorities construct engagement and partnership working
【24h】

What is going wrong with community engagement? How flood communities and flood authorities construct engagement and partnership working

机译:社区参与怎么出错了? 洪水社区和洪水当局如何建造订婚和伙伴关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we discuss the need for flood risk management in England that engages stakeholders with flooding and its management processes, including knowledge gathering, planning and decision-making. By comparing and contrasting how flood communities experience 'community engagement' and 'partnership working', through the medium of an online questionnaire, with the process's and ways of working that the Environment Agency use when 'working with others', we demonstrate that flood risk management is caught up in technocratic ways of working derived from long-standing historical practices of defending agricultural land from water. Despite the desire to move towards more democratised ways of working which enable an integrated approach to managing flood risk, the technocratic framing still pervades contemporary flood risk management. We establish that this can disconnect society from flooding and negatively impacts the implementation of more participatory approaches designed to engage flood communities in partnership working.
机译:在本文中,我们讨论了英格兰洪水风险管理的需求,以利益相关者与洪水及其管理流程,包括知识聚会,规划和决策。通过比较和对比如何通过在线问卷的媒体进行洪水社区经验,通过在线调查问卷的媒体,与“与他人合作”时的环境代理使用的过程和方式,我们表现出洪水风险管理层陷入了从水中捍卫农业用地的长期历史实践的技术优势。尽管渴望走向更茂物的工作方式,但能够综合办法管理洪水风险,但技术专家框架仍然遍及当代洪水风险管理。我们确定这可以将社会与洪水和负面影响的影响脱颖而出,旨在实现泛滥社区的更多参与式方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号