...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Reviews >Cause-effect analysis for sustainable development policy
【24h】

Cause-effect analysis for sustainable development policy

机译:可持续发展政策的原因分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The sustainable development goals (SDGs) launched by the United Nations (UN) set a new direction for development covering the environmental, economic, and social pillars. Given the complex and interdependent nature of the socioeconomic and environmental systems, however, understanding the cause-effect relationships between policy actions and their outcomes on SDGs remains as a challenge. We provide a systematic review of cause-effect analysis literature in the context of quantitative sustainability assessment. The cause-effect analysis literature in both social and natural sciences has significantly gained its breadth and depth, and some of the pioneering applications have begun to address sustainability challenges. We focus on randomized experiment studies, natural experiments, observational studies, and time-series methods, and the applicability of these approaches to quantitative sustainability assessment with respect to the plausibility of the assumptions, limitations and the data requirements. Despite the promising developments, however, we find that quantifying the sustainability consequences of a policy action, and providing unequivocal policy recommendations based on it is still a challenge. We recognize some of the key data requirements and assumptions necessary to design formal experiments as the bottleneck for conducting scientifically defensible cause-effect analysis in the context of quantitative sustainability assessment. Our study calls for the need of multidisciplinary effort to develop an operational framework for quantifying the sustainability consequences of policy actions. In the meantime, continued efforts need to be made to advance other modeling platforms such as mechanistic models and simulation tools. We highlighted the importance of understanding and properly communicating the uncertainties associated with such models, regular monitoring and feedback on the consequences of policy actions to the modelers and decision-makers, and the use of what-if scenarios in the absence of well-formulated cause-effect analysis.
机译:联合国(联合国)推出的可持续发展目标(SDGS)为环境,经济和社会支柱制定了新的发展方向。然而,鉴于社会经济和环境系统的复杂性和相互依存性质,了解政策行动与SDGS的结果之间的原因关系仍然是一项挑战。在定量可持续性评估的背景下,我们对原因分析文献进行了系统审查。社会和自然科学的原因分析文献显着提高了其广度和深度,其中一些开创性的应用已经开始解决可持续发展挑战。我们专注于随机实验研究,自然实验,观测研究和时间序列方法,以及这些方法对定量可持续性评估的适用性是关于假设,限制和数据要求的合理性的定量可持续性评估。然而,尽管有希望的发展,但我们发现量化了政策行动的可持续性后果,并根据仍然是一项挑战,提供明确的政策建议。我们认识到设计正式实验所必需的一些关键数据要求和假设,作为在定量可持续性评估的背景下进行科学可靠的原因分析的瓶颈。我们的研究要求需要多学科努力制定运营框架,用于量化政策行动的可持续性后果。与此同时,需要继续努力推进其他建模平台,例如机械模型和仿真工具。我们强调了理解和适当地传达与此类模式相关的不确定性,定期监测和反馈对建模者和决策者的后果的不确定性,以及在没有良好制定的原因的情况下使用什么情况 - 分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号