首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Geology >Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) based mapping in engineering geological surveys: Considerations for optimum results
【24h】

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) based mapping in engineering geological surveys: Considerations for optimum results

机译:基于无人的空中车辆(UAV)工程地质调查中的映射:最佳结果的考虑因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractUAVs have been used in engineering for at least two decades, mainly focusing on structural health monitoring, geological surveys and site inspections, especially at cases where a rapid assessment is required, for example after a natural disaster. While there is a wide range of recognition algorithms for the automatic identification of structural damage, structural geological features etc. from the acquired images, the parameters affecting the resolution of these images are often overlooked. As a result, the UAV technology is not used at its full potential and at times, it is even regarded as leading to poor outcomes. This paper discusses the main parameters affecting the resolution of the images acquired by a UAV. We present a case study of the structural geological mapping of a coastal area carried out using two types of UAVs: a fixed wing and a hexacopter. A comparison between the structural geological maps based on the orthophotos and one produced using conventional techniques shows that the level of detail is the same and the time spent is at least 5 times less when using a UAV. The fixed wing is faster and therefore, can cover large areas while the copter gives better resolution images as it can fly at lower heights. The latter is cost and time effective only if it is used for surveys limited to small areas. The characterization of some structural geological features has not been possible based solely on the orthophotos. We show that in order to achieve the desired accuracy, a ground sample distance of at least half that value is required. We discuss technical aspects, such as the effect of topography and UAV orientation on the overlap value, the camera calibration, number of control points and lighting conditions, that should be taken into account prior to flying a UAV and provide recommendations on how to obtain optimum results, i.e. orthophotos that suit the needs of the project.Highlights?Engineering geological maps based on UAVs are detailed and georeferenced.?The main technical parameters for optimum UAV use are considered.?The GSD value should be at least half the accuracy required by the project.?The optimum type of UAV is dictated by the application.?Topography can significantly affect the overlap value and quality of orthophoto.]]>
机译:<![cdata [ 抽象 UAV已在工程中使用至少二十年,主要关注结构健康监测,地质调查和现场检查,特别是在需要快速评估的情况下,例如在自然灾害之后。虽然来自所获取的图像的结构损坏,结构地质特征等的自动识别各种识别算法,但是影响影响这些图像的分辨率的参数通常被忽略。因此,无人机技术在其全部潜力下不使用,有时候,甚至被认为是导致结果不佳。本文讨论了影响UAV获取的图像分辨率的主要参数。我们展示了使用两种类型的无人机进行的沿海地区的结构地质映射的案例研究:固定翼和六泊位。基于正轨和使用传统技术产生的结构地质图之间的比较表明,在使用无人机时,细节水平是相同的,并且在使用者时花费的时间至少少5倍。固定机翼更快,因此,可以覆盖大面积,同时直升机提供更好的分辨率图像,因为它可以在较低的高度处飞行。只有当它用于衡量限于小区域的调查时,后者才是成本和时间。某些结构地质特征的表征尚未完全基于正射科体。我们表明,为了达到所需的精度,需要至少需要一半的地面样本距离。我们讨论技术方面,如地形和无人机取向对重叠值的影响,相机校准,控制点和照明条件的数量,在飞行无人机之前应考虑到,并提供关于如何获得最佳的建议结果,即适合该项目需求的矫形器。 突出显示 基于UAV的工程地质图是详细的和地理学的。 主要技术考虑了最佳UAV的参数。 GSD值应至少为项目所需的准确性的一半。 应用程序的最佳类型由应用程序决定。 地形可以显着影响重叠值和质量的orthophoto。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号